Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press
Barr, Michael. Fuzzy Set Theory and Topos Theory. Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 29 (1986) no. 4, pp. 501-508. doi: 10.4153/CMB-1986-079-9
@article{10_4153_CMB_1986_079_9,
author = {Barr, Michael},
title = {Fuzzy {Set} {Theory} and {Topos} {Theory}},
journal = {Canadian mathematical bulletin},
pages = {501--508},
year = {1986},
volume = {29},
number = {4},
doi = {10.4153/CMB-1986-079-9},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1986-079-9/}
}
[1] 1. Barr, M., £;racr Categories, in Exact Categories and Categories of Sheaves, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 236 Springer-Verlag (1972). pp. 1–120. Google Scholar
[2] 2. Barr, M. and Wells, C. F., Triples, Toposes and Theories, Springer-Verlag, (1985). Google Scholar
[3] 3. Eytan, M., Fuzzy sets: A topos-logical point of view, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 5 (1981), pp. 47—67. Google Scholar
[4] 4. Fourman, M. P. and Scott, D. S., Applications of Sheaves, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 753 Springer-Verlag, (1979). Google Scholar
[5] 5. Goguen, J., Concept representation in natural and artificial languages: Axioms, extensions and applications for fuzzy sets, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 6 (1974), pp. 513–561. Google Scholar
[6] 6. Higgs, D., A category approach to Boolean valued models, Preprint, University of Waterloo, (1973). Google Scholar
[7] 7. Johnstone, P. T., Stone Spaces, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Vol. 3 Cambridge University Press, (1982). Google Scholar
[8] 8. Pitts, A. M., Fuzzy sets do not form a topos, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 8 (1982), pp. 101 — 104. Google Scholar
Cité par Sources :