Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press
Dixon, John D. How Good is Hadamard’s Inequality for Determinants?. Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 27 (1984) no. 3, pp. 260-264. doi: 10.4153/CMB-1984-039-2
@article{10_4153_CMB_1984_039_2,
author = {Dixon, John D.},
title = {How {Good} is {Hadamard{\textquoteright}s} {Inequality} for {Determinants?}},
journal = {Canadian mathematical bulletin},
pages = {260--264},
year = {1984},
volume = {27},
number = {3},
doi = {10.4153/CMB-1984-039-2},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1984-039-2/}
}
[1] 1. Cabay, S. and Lam, T. P. L., Congruence techniques for the exact solution of integer systems of linear equations, ACM Trans. Math. Software 3 (1977) 386–397. Google Scholar
[2] 2. Dixon, J. D., Estimating extremal eigenvalues and condition numbers of matrices, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 20 (1983), 812–814. Google Scholar
[3] 3. Johnson, C. R. and Newman, M., How bad is the Hadamard determinantal bound?, J. Res. Nat. Bureau Stand. 78B (1974) 167–169. Google Scholar
[4] 4. Shiue, J. S., On a generalization of a theorem of Johnson and Newman, Soochow J. Math. Natur. Sci. 2 (1976) 57–61. Google Scholar
[5] 5. Szekeres, G., The average value of skew Hadamard matrices, in Proc. First Austral. Conf. Combinatorial Math. (Newcastle, 1972), pp. 55–59. Google Scholar
[6] 6. Szekeres, G. and Turán, P., On an extremal problem in determinant theory, Mat. természett. Ertes. 56 (1937) 796–804 (Hungarian) (see Zbl. Math. 18 (1938) 387). Google Scholar
[7] 7. Wilks, S. S., Mathematical Statistics, Wiley, New York, 1962. Google Scholar
Cité par Sources :