Non-Parallelizability of Grassmann Manifolds
Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 27 (1984) no. 1, pp. 127-128
Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge
The fact that no real Grassmann manifolds G k(Rn) are parallelizable (or even stably parallelizable) except for the obvious cases G1R2≅S1, G1(R4)≅G3(R4) ≅ RP3, and G1(R8)≅ G7(R8) ≅ RP7 was first noted by Hiller and Stong. Their work in turn depends on induction and the work of Oproiu, who examined detailed calculations of Stiefel-Whitney classes for k = 2, 3. In this note we give a short proof of this result, using elementary results from K-theory, that also covers the complex and quaternionic Grassmann manifolds.
Trew, S.; Zvengrowski, P. Non-Parallelizability of Grassmann Manifolds. Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 27 (1984) no. 1, pp. 127-128. doi: 10.4153/CMB-1984-019-x
@article{10_4153_CMB_1984_019_x,
author = {Trew, S. and Zvengrowski, P.},
title = {Non-Parallelizability of {Grassmann} {Manifolds}},
journal = {Canadian mathematical bulletin},
pages = {127--128},
year = {1984},
volume = {27},
number = {1},
doi = {10.4153/CMB-1984-019-x},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1984-019-x/}
}
Cité par Sources :