On the Non-Existence of Certain Euler Products
Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 23 (1980) no. 3, pp. 371-372
Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge
In a paper with the above title, T. M. Apostol and S. Chowla [1] proved the following result:Theorem 1.For relatively prime integers h and k, l ≤ h ≤ k, the series does not admit of an Euler product decomposition, that is, an identity of the form 1 except when h = k = l; fc = 1, fc = 2. The series on the right is extended over all primes p and is assumed to be absolutely convergent forR(s)>1.
Subbarao, M. V. On the Non-Existence of Certain Euler Products. Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 23 (1980) no. 3, pp. 371-372. doi: 10.4153/CMB-1980-054-7
@article{10_4153_CMB_1980_054_7,
author = {Subbarao, M. V.},
title = {On the {Non-Existence} of {Certain} {Euler} {Products}},
journal = {Canadian mathematical bulletin},
pages = {371--372},
year = {1980},
volume = {23},
number = {3},
doi = {10.4153/CMB-1980-054-7},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1980-054-7/}
}
Cité par Sources :