Geodesic
On the Weak Global Dimension of Pseudovaluation Domains
Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 21 (1978) no. 2, pp. 159-164

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press

In [7], Hedstrom and Houston introduce a type of quasilocal integral domain, therein dubbed a pseudo-valuation domain (for short, a PVD), which possesses many of the ideal-theoretic properties of valuation domains. For the reader′s convenience and reference purposes, Proposition 2.1 lists some of the ideal-theoretic characterizations of PVD′s given in [7]. As the terminology suggests, any valuation domain is a PVD. Since valuation domains may be characterized as the quasilocal domains of weak global dimension at most 1, a homological study of PVD's seems appropriate. This note initiates such a study by establishing (see Theorem 2.3) that the only possible weak global dimensions of a PVD are 0, 1, 2 and ∞. One upshot (Corollary 3.4) is that a coherent PVD cannot have weak global dimension 2: hence, none of the domains of weak global dimension 2 which appear in [10, Section 5.5] can be a PVD. 
Dobbs, David E. On the Weak Global Dimension of Pseudovaluation Domains. Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 21 (1978) no. 2, pp. 159-164. doi: 10.4153/CMB-1978-027-9
@article{10_4153_CMB_1978_027_9,
     author = {Dobbs, David E.},
     title = {On the {Weak} {Global} {Dimension} of {Pseudovaluation} {Domains}},
     journal = {Canadian mathematical bulletin},
     pages = {159--164},
     year = {1978},
     volume = {21},
     number = {2},
     doi = {10.4153/CMB-1978-027-9},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1978-027-9/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Dobbs, David E.
TI  - On the Weak Global Dimension of Pseudovaluation Domains
JO  - Canadian mathematical bulletin
PY  - 1978
SP  - 159
EP  - 164
VL  - 21
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1978-027-9/
DO  - 10.4153/CMB-1978-027-9
ID  - 10_4153_CMB_1978_027_9
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Dobbs, David E.
%T On the Weak Global Dimension of Pseudovaluation Domains
%J Canadian mathematical bulletin
%D 1978
%P 159-164
%V 21
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1978-027-9/
%R 10.4153/CMB-1978-027-9
%F 10_4153_CMB_1978_027_9

[1] 1. Dobbs, D. E. and Papick, I. J., When is D + M coherent?, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 56 (1976), 51-54. Google Scholar

[2] 2. Dobbs, D. E., On going-down for simple overrings, II, Comm. in Algebra 1 (1974), 439-458. Google Scholar

[3] 3. Dobbs, D. E., On the global dimensions ofD + M, Canad. Math. Bull. 18 (1975), 657-660. Google Scholar

[4] 4. Dobbs, D. E., Divided rings and going-down, Pac. J. Math. 67 (1976), 353-363. Google Scholar

[5] 5. Dobbs, D. E., Coherence, ascent of going-down and pseudo-valuation domains, submitted for publication. Google Scholar

[6] 6. Gilmer, R. and Huckuba, J. A., A-rings, J. Algebra 28 (1974), 414-432. Google Scholar

[7] 7. Hedstrom, J. R. and Houston, E. G., Pseudo-valuation domains, Pac. J. Math., to appear. Google Scholar

[8] 8. Sally, J. D. and Vasconcelos, W. V., Flat ideals, I, Comm. in Algebra 3 (1975), 531-543. Google Scholar

[9] 9. Vasconcelos, W. V., Divisor theory in module categories, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974. Google Scholar

[10] 10. Vasconcelos, W. V., The rings of dimension two, Dekker, New York, 1976. Google Scholar

Cité par Sources :