A Note on Semihereditary Rings
Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 16 (1973) no. 3, pp. 439-440
Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press
It's well known (see Endo [1]) that for a commutative ring A, if A is semihereditary then w.gl. dim. A ≤ 1. It seems worth recording the noncommutative version of this.
Enochs, E. A Note on Semihereditary Rings. Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 16 (1973) no. 3, pp. 439-440. doi: 10.4153/CMB-1973-070-2
@article{10_4153_CMB_1973_070_2,
author = {Enochs, E.},
title = {A {Note} on {Semihereditary} {Rings}},
journal = {Canadian mathematical bulletin},
pages = {439--440},
year = {1973},
volume = {16},
number = {3},
doi = {10.4153/CMB-1973-070-2},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1973-070-2/}
}
[1] 1. Endo, S., On semihereditary rings, J. Math. Soc. Japan 13 (1961), 109–119. Google Scholar
[2] 2. Maddox, B. H., Absolutely pure modules, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (1967), 155–158. Google Scholar
[3] 3. Cohn, P. M., On the free product of associative rings I, Math. Z. 71 (1959), 380–398. Google Scholar
[4] 4. Megibben, C., Absolutely pure modules, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 26 (1970), 561–566. Google Scholar
[5] 5. Lambek, J., A module is flat if and only if its character module is injective, Canad. Math. Bull. 7 (1964), 237–243. Google Scholar
Cité par Sources :