Representation Theories for the Laplace Transform
Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 10 (1967) no. 3, pp. 333-345
Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press
The Widder-Post real inversion operator [4[ is defined by 1.1 k = 1, 2,.... Utilizing this inversion operator one can obtain the following representation theorem (see e.g. [4[ Chapter VII, Theorem 15a).
Heinig, H. P. Representation Theories for the Laplace Transform. Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 10 (1967) no. 3, pp. 333-345. doi: 10.4153/CMB-1967-030-4
@article{10_4153_CMB_1967_030_4,
author = {Heinig, H. P.},
title = {Representation {Theories} for the {Laplace} {Transform}},
journal = {Canadian mathematical bulletin},
pages = {333--345},
year = {1967},
volume = {10},
number = {3},
doi = {10.4153/CMB-1967-030-4},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1967-030-4/}
}
[1] 1. Lorentz, G. G., Bernstein Polynomials. Toronto (1955). Google Scholar
[2] 2. Rooney, P. G., A Generalization of some Theorems of Hardy. Trans. Royal Soc. Can., Ser III, Sect. Ill (XLIX), (1955). Google Scholar
[3] 3. Taylor, A. E., Introduction to Functional Analysis. New York (1955). Google Scholar
[4] 4. Widder, D. V., The Laplace Transform. Princeton (1944). Google Scholar
[5] 5. Zygmund, A., Trigonometric Series. Vol. I. Cambridge (1955). Google Scholar
Cité par Sources :