The Meaning of Mono and EPI in Some Familiar Categories
Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 8 (1965) no. 6, pp. 759-769
Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press
This expository note was prompted by some questions asked by Professor P. Hilton during his lectures "Catégories non-abétiennes" at the University of Montréal, July 1964.The descriptions of set functions as one to one and as onto can be characterized in terms of set function composition. A set function is one to one iff it has the left cancellation property, that is, f · g = f · h implies g = h.
Burgess, W. The Meaning of Mono and EPI in Some Familiar Categories. Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 8 (1965) no. 6, pp. 759-769. doi: 10.4153/CMB-1965-056-x
@article{10_4153_CMB_1965_056_x,
author = {Burgess, W.},
title = {The {Meaning} of {Mono} and {EPI} in {Some} {Familiar} {Categories}},
journal = {Canadian mathematical bulletin},
pages = {759--769},
year = {1965},
volume = {8},
number = {6},
doi = {10.4153/CMB-1965-056-x},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1965-056-x/}
}
[1] 1. Birkhoff, G., Lattice Theory. A.M. S., multilithed notes, 1963. Google Scholar
[2] 2. Freyd, P., Abelian Categories. Harper and Row, New York, 1964. Google Scholar
[3] 3. Isbell, J. R., Uniform Spaces. Math. Surveys, A. M. S., Providence, 1964. Google Scholar
[4] 4. Kelley, J. L., General Topology. Van Nostrand, New York, 1955. Google Scholar
[5] 5. Kowalsky, H. Y., Kategorien Topologischer Räume. Math. Z, 77 (249-272). Google Scholar
[6] 6. Kurosh, A. G., The Theory of Groups, vol. II. Chelsea, New York, 1960. Google Scholar
Cité par Sources :