Remarks on a Paper by S. Trott
Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 7 (1964) no. 1, pp. 49-51
Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge
There are several statements in [3] which require clarification.Theorem 1 [3, p. 246] states that U3= U2U4 U2 -1U4 U2 U4. In fact this is (essentially) the relation O = PUPU-1PU given in [1, p. 91, (7.35)]. To see this we note that 0 = U3, P = U4, U = U4U2U4 (as explained in [1, p. 88]); since U4 2, = E,
Moser, W. O. J. Remarks on a Paper by S. Trott. Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 7 (1964) no. 1, pp. 49-51. doi: 10.4153/CMB-1964-006-7
@article{10_4153_CMB_1964_006_7,
author = {Moser, W. O. J.},
title = {Remarks on a {Paper} by {S.} {Trott}},
journal = {Canadian mathematical bulletin},
pages = {49--51},
year = {1964},
volume = {7},
number = {1},
doi = {10.4153/CMB-1964-006-7},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1964-006-7/}
}
Cité par Sources :