Geodesic
Equivariant Formality for Actions of Torus Groups
Canadian journal of mathematics, Tome 56 (2004) no. 6, pp. 1290-1307

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press

This paper contains a comparison of several definitions of equivariant formality for actions of torus groups. We develop and prove some relations between the definitions. Focusing on the case of the circle group, we use ${{S}^{1}}$ -equivariant minimal models to give a number of examples of ${{S}^{1}}$ -spaces illustrating the properties of the various definitions.
DOI : 10.4153/CJM-2004-056-5
Mots-clés : 55P91, 55P62, 55R35, 55S45, Equivariant homotopy, circle action, minimal model, rationalization, formality 
Scull, Laura. Equivariant Formality for Actions of Torus Groups. Canadian journal of mathematics, Tome 56 (2004) no. 6, pp. 1290-1307. doi: 10.4153/CJM-2004-056-5
@article{10_4153_CJM_2004_056_5,
     author = {Scull, Laura},
     title = {Equivariant {Formality} for {Actions} of {Torus} {Groups}},
     journal = {Canadian journal of mathematics},
     pages = {1290--1307},
     year = {2004},
     volume = {56},
     number = {6},
     doi = {10.4153/CJM-2004-056-5},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CJM-2004-056-5/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Scull, Laura
TI  - Equivariant Formality for Actions of Torus Groups
JO  - Canadian journal of mathematics
PY  - 2004
SP  - 1290
EP  - 1307
VL  - 56
IS  - 6
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CJM-2004-056-5/
DO  - 10.4153/CJM-2004-056-5
ID  - 10_4153_CJM_2004_056_5
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Scull, Laura
%T Equivariant Formality for Actions of Torus Groups
%J Canadian journal of mathematics
%D 2004
%P 1290-1307
%V 56
%N 6
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CJM-2004-056-5/
%R 10.4153/CJM-2004-056-5
%F 10_4153_CJM_2004_056_5

[1] [1] Borel, A., Seminar on Transformation Groups. Annals of Mathematics Studies, 46, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1960. Google Scholar

[2] [2] Bousfield, A.K. and Gugenheim, V. K. A.M., On PL de Rham theory and rational homotopy type. Mem. Amer.Math. Soc. 8(1976). Google Scholar

[3] [3] Bredon, G., Equivariant Cohomology Theories. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 34, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1967. Google Scholar

[4] [4] Deligne, P., Griffiths, P., Morgan, J. and Sullivan, D., Real homotopy theory of Kähler manifolds. Invent.Math. 29(1975), 245–274 . Google Scholar

[5] [5] Elmendorf, A., Systems of fixed point sets. Trans. Amer.Math. Soc. 277(1983), 275–284. . Google Scholar

[6] [6] Felix, Y., Halperin, S., and Thomas, J.-C., Rational Homotopy Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 205, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001. Google Scholar

[7] [7] Fine, B.L. and Triantafillou, G., On the equivariant formality of Kähler manifolds with finite group action. Canad. J. Math. 45(1993), 1200–1210. Google Scholar

[8] [8] Goresky, M., Kottwitz, R. and MacPherson, R., Equivariant cohomology, Koszul duality, and the localization theorem. Invent.Math. 131(1998), 25–83. Google Scholar

[9] [9] Lillywhite, S., Formality in an equivariant setting. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 355(2003), 2771–2793. Google Scholar

[10] [10] Mandell, M. and Scull, L., Algebraic models for equivariant homotopy theory over Abelian compact Lie groups. Math. Z. 240(2002), 261–287. Google Scholar

[11] [11] Scull, L., Rational S1-equivariant homotopy theory. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 354(2001), 1–45. Google Scholar

[12] [12] Scull, L., Formality and S1-equivariant algebraic models. Proceedings of the Northwestern University Algebraic Topology Conference, P. Goerss,Mahowald, M., and Priddy, S., eds., to appear. Google Scholar

[13] [13] Sullivan, D., Infinitesimal computations in topology. Inst. Hautes Eudes Sci. Publ. Math. 47(1977), 269–332. Google Scholar

Cité par Sources :