Nilpotent Orbit Varieties and the Atomic Decomposition of the Q-Kostka Polynomials
Canadian journal of mathematics, Tome 50 (1998) no. 3, pp. 525-537

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press

We study the coordinate rings of $k\left[ \overline{{{\text{C}}_{\mu }}}\,\bigcap \,\text{t} \right]$ scheme-theoretic intersections of nilpotent orbit closures with the diagonal matrices. Here ${\mu }'$ gives the Jordan block structure of the nilpotent matrix. de Concini and Procesi [5] proved a conjecture of Kraft [12] that these rings are isomorphic to the cohomology rings of the varieties constructed by Springer [22, 23]. The famous $q$ -Kostka polynomial ${{\tilde{K}}_{\lambda \mu }}(q)$ is the Hilbert series for the multiplicity of the irreducible symmetric group representation indexed by $\lambda $ in the ring $k\left[ \overline{{{\text{C}}_{\mu }}}\,\bigcap \,\text{t} \right]$ . Lascoux and Schützenberger [15, 13] gave combinatorially a decomposition of ${{\tilde{K}}_{\lambda \mu }}(q)$ as a sum of “atomic” polynomials with non-negative integer coefficients, and Lascoux proposed a corresponding decomposition in the cohomology model.Our work provides a geometric interpretation of the atomic decomposition. The Frobenius-splitting results of Mehta and van der Kallen [19] imply a direct-sum decomposition of the ideals of nilpotent orbit closures, arising from the inclusions of the corresponding sets. We carry out the restriction to the diagonal using a recent theorem of Broer [3]. This gives a direct-sum decomposition of the ideals yielding the $k\left[ \overline{{{\text{C}}_{\mu }}}\,\bigcap \,\text{t} \right]$ , and a new proof of the atomic decomposition of the $q$ -Kostka polynomials.
DOI : 10.4153/CJM-1998-028-3
Mots-clés : 05E10, 14M99, 20G05, 05E15, q-Kostka polynomials, atomic decomposition, nilpotent conjugacy classes, nilpotent orbit varieties
Brockman, William; Haiman, Mark. Nilpotent Orbit Varieties and the Atomic Decomposition of the Q-Kostka Polynomials. Canadian journal of mathematics, Tome 50 (1998) no. 3, pp. 525-537. doi: 10.4153/CJM-1998-028-3
@article{10_4153_CJM_1998_028_3,
     author = {Brockman, William and Haiman, Mark},
     title = {Nilpotent {Orbit} {Varieties} and the {Atomic} {Decomposition} of the {Q-Kostka} {Polynomials}},
     journal = {Canadian journal of mathematics},
     pages = {525--537},
     year = {1998},
     volume = {50},
     number = {3},
     doi = {10.4153/CJM-1998-028-3},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CJM-1998-028-3/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Brockman, William
AU  - Haiman, Mark
TI  - Nilpotent Orbit Varieties and the Atomic Decomposition of the Q-Kostka Polynomials
JO  - Canadian journal of mathematics
PY  - 1998
SP  - 525
EP  - 537
VL  - 50
IS  - 3
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CJM-1998-028-3/
DO  - 10.4153/CJM-1998-028-3
ID  - 10_4153_CJM_1998_028_3
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Brockman, William
%A Haiman, Mark
%T Nilpotent Orbit Varieties and the Atomic Decomposition of the Q-Kostka Polynomials
%J Canadian journal of mathematics
%D 1998
%P 525-537
%V 50
%N 3
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CJM-1998-028-3/
%R 10.4153/CJM-1998-028-3
%F 10_4153_CJM_1998_028_3

[1] 1. Bayer, D. and Stillman, M., Macaulay 2: A systemfor computation in algebraic geometry and commutative algebra. Computer software, 1996–7. http://www.math.uiuc.edu/Macaulay2/. Google Scholar

[2] 2. Bergeron, N. and Garsia, A., On certain spaces of harmonic polynomials. Contemporary Math. (86) 138, 1992. Google Scholar

[3] 3. Broer, A., The sum of generalized exponents and Chevalley's restriction theorem for modules of covariants. Indag. Math. (N.S.) (4) 6(1995), 385–396. Google Scholar

[4] 4. Carrell, J.B., Orbits of the Weyl group and a theorem of de Concini and Procesi. Compositio Math. (1) 60(1986), 45–52. Google Scholar

[5] 5. de Concini, C. and Procesi, C., Symmetric functions, conjugacy classes, and the flag variety. Invent.Math. 64(1981), 203–219. Google Scholar

[6] 6. Foulkes, H.O., A survey of some combinatorial aspects of symmetric functions. In: Permutations (Actes Colloq. Université René Descartes, Paris, 10-13 juillet 1972), 79–92. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1974. Google Scholar

[7] 7. Garsia, A. and Procesi, C., On certain graded Sn-modules and the q-Kostka polynomials. Adv. Math. 94(1992), 82–138. Google Scholar

[8] 8. Gutkin, E.A., Representations of the Weyl group in the space of vectors of zero weight. Uspehi. Mat. Nauk 28(1973), 237–238. Google Scholar

[9] 9. Hotta, R. and Springer, T.A., A specialization theorem for certain Weyl group representations and an application to the Green polynomials of unitary groups. Invent. Math. 41(1977), 113–127. Google Scholar

[10] 10. Kostant, B., Lie group representations on polynomial rings. Amer. J.Math. 86(1963), 327–404. Google Scholar

[11] 11. Kostant, B., On Macdonald's η-function formula, the Laplacian and generalized exponents. Adv. Math. 20(1976), 179–212. Google Scholar

[12] 12. Kraft, H., Conjugacy classes and Weyl group representations. Astérisque (1981), 191–205. Google Scholar

[13] 13. Lascoux, A., Cyclic permutations on words, tableaux, and harmonic polynomials. In: Proceedings of the Hyderabad Conference on Algebraic Groups (Hyderabad, 1989). Manoj Prakashan, Madras, 1991. 323–347. Google Scholar

[14] 14. Lascoux, A. and Schützenberger, M. P., Croissance des polynômes Foulkes-Green. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A 288(1979), 95–98. Google Scholar

[15] 15. Lascoux, A. and Schützenberger, M. P., Le monoïde plaxique. In: Noncommutative structures in Algebra and Geometric Combinatorics . CNR, Rome, 1981, 129–156. Google Scholar

[16] 16. Lusztig, G., Green polynomials and singularities of unipotent classes. Adv. inMath. 42(1981), 169–178. Google Scholar

[17] 17. Lusztig, G., Singularities, character formulas, and a q-analog of weight multiplicities. Analyse et topologie sur les espaces singuliers (II-III), Astérisque 101–102(1983), 208–227. Google Scholar

[18] 18. Macdonald, I.G., Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Second edition, Oxford University Press, 1995. Google Scholar

[19] 19. Mehta, V.B. and van der Kallen, W., A simultaneous Frobenius splitting for closures of conjugacy classes of nilpotent matrices. Compositio Math. (2) 84(1992), 211–221. Google Scholar

[20] 20. Schützenberger, M., Propriétés nouvelles des tableaux de Young. In: Théorie des nombres: Séminaire Delange-Pisot-Poitou, 19e année, volume 2, Paris, 1978. SecrétariatMath. (Exp. 26, 14 pages). Google Scholar

[21] 21. Spaltenstein, N., On the fixed point set of a unipotent transformation on the flag manifold. Proc. Kon. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. 79(1976), 452–456. Google Scholar

[22] 22. Springer, T.A., Trigonometric sums, Green functions of finite groups and representations of Weyl groups. Invent. Math. 36(1976), 173–207. Google Scholar

[23] 23. Springer, T.A. , A construction of representations of Weyl groups. Invent. Math. 44(1978), 279–293. Google Scholar

[24] 24. Steinberg, R., On the desingularization of the unipotent variety. Invent. Math. 36(1976), 209–224. Google Scholar

[25] 25. Tanisaki, T., Defining ideals of the closures of the conjugacy classes and representations of the Weyl groups. Tôhoku Math. J. 34(1982), 575–585. Google Scholar

[26] 26. Weyman, J., The equations of conjugacy classes of nilpotent matrices. Invent. Math. (2) 98(1989), 229–245. Google Scholar

Cité par Sources :