Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press
Parameswaran, Mangalam R. New Tauberian Theorems from Old. Canadian journal of mathematics, Tome 46 (1994) no. 2, pp. 380-394. doi: 10.4153/CJM-1994-019-2
@article{10_4153_CJM_1994_019_2,
author = {Parameswaran, Mangalam R.},
title = {New {Tauberian} {Theorems} from {Old}},
journal = {Canadian journal of mathematics},
pages = {380--394},
year = {1994},
volume = {46},
number = {2},
doi = {10.4153/CJM-1994-019-2},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CJM-1994-019-2/}
}
[1] 1. Borwein, D., A Tauberian theorem concerning Borel-type and Riesz summability methods, Canad. Math. Bull. 35(1992), 14–20. Google Scholar
[2] 2. Borwein, D. and Robinson, I. J. W., A Tauberian theorem for Borel-type methods ofsummability, J. Reine Angew. Math. 273(1975), 153–164. Google Scholar
[3] 3. Goes, G., Bounded variation sequences of order k and the representation of null sequences,1. Reine Angew. Math. 253(1972), 152–161. Google Scholar
[4] 4. Ishiguro, K., Tauberian theorems concerning the summability by methods of logarithmic type, Proc. Japan Acad. (3)39(1963), 156–159. Google Scholar
[5] 5. Jakimovski, A., On a Tauberian theorem by O. Szasz, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 5(1954), 67–70. Google Scholar
[6] 6. Karamata, J., Sur les théorèmes inverses des procédés de sommabilité, Paris, Hermann, 1937. Google Scholar
[7] 7. Kaufman, B. L., O teoremakh tipa Taubera dlya logarifmiceskikh metodov summirovaniya, in Russian, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Mat. (56) 1(1967), 57–62. Google Scholar
[8] 8. Kuttner, B. and Parameswaran, M. R., A Tauberian theoremfor Bore l summability, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 102(1987), 135–138. Google Scholar
[9] 9. Kuttner, B. and Parameswaran, M. R., A product theorem anda Tauberian theorem for Euler methods,]. London Math. Soc. (2) 18(1978), 299–304. Google Scholar
[10] 10. Kwee, B., Some Tauberian theorems for the logarithmic method of summability, Canad. J. Math. 20(1968), 1324–1331. Google Scholar
[11] 11. Kwee, B., The relation between the Borel and Riesz methods of summation, Bull. London Math. Soc. 21 (1989), 287–393. Google Scholar
[12] 12. Leviatan, D., Remarks on some Tauberian theorems ofMeyer-Konig, Tietz andStieglitz, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 29(1971), 126–132. Google Scholar
[13] 13. Meyer-Konig, W. and Tietz, H., On Tauberian conditions of type o, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73(1967), 926- 927. Google Scholar
[14] 14. Meyer-Konig, W. and Tietz, H., liber die Limitierungsumkehrsatze vom typ o, Studia Math. 31(1968), 205–216. Google Scholar
[15] 15 Meyer-Konig, W. and Tietz, H., liber Umkehrbedingungen in der Limitierungstheorie, Arch. Math. (Brno) 5(1969), 177–186. Google Scholar
[16] 16. Parameswaran, M. R., On a generalization of a theorem ofMeyer-Konig, Math. Z. 162(1975), 201–204. Google Scholar
[17] 17. Parameswaran, M. R., Some Tauberian theorems related to the logarithmic methods of summability, Glas. Mat. 12(1977), 299–303. Google Scholar
[18] 18. Parameswaran, M. R., Some remarks on Borel summability, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 10(1959), 224–229. Google Scholar
[19] 19. Rangachari, M. S. and Y. Sitaraman, Tauberian theorems for logarithmic summability (L), Tôhoku Math. J. 16(1964), 257–269. Google Scholar
[20] 20. Stieglitz, M., Uber ausgezeichnete Tauber-Matrizen, Arch. Math. (Brno) 5(1969), 227–233. Google Scholar
[21] 21. Szasz, O., A generalization of two theorems of Hardy and Littlewood, Duke Math. J. 1(1935), 105–111. Google Scholar
[22] 22. Tietz, H., Uber Umkehrbedingungen bei gewohnlicher und absoluter Limitierung, Studia Math. 80(1984), 47–52. Google Scholar
[23] 23. Tietz, H., Negative Resultate uber Tauber-Bedingungen, Monatsh. Math. 75( 1971), 69–78. Google Scholar
Cité par Sources :