Contractive Representation Theory for the Unitary Group of C(X, M 2)
Canadian journal of mathematics, Tome 39 (1987) no. 3, pp. 612-624

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press

One motivation for studying representation theory for the unitary group of a unital C*-algebra arises from Theoretical Physics. (In the latter connection, Segal [9] and Arveson [1] have developed a representation theory for G. Their approach is in a different direction from ours.) Another motivation for studying the representation theory of G arises out of the desire to unify the theories of amenable von Neumann algebras and amenable locally compact groups.A serious problem for such a representation theory is the absence of Haar measure on G in general.In [7], the author introduced the class Repd G of contractive unitary representations of G, the strong metric condition involved compensating for the lack of Haar measure.
Paterson, Alan L. T. Contractive Representation Theory for the Unitary Group of C(X, M 2). Canadian journal of mathematics, Tome 39 (1987) no. 3, pp. 612-624. doi: 10.4153/CJM-1987-029-0
@article{10_4153_CJM_1987_029_0,
     author = {Paterson, Alan L. T.},
     title = {Contractive {Representation} {Theory} for the {Unitary} {Group} of {C(X,} {M} 2)},
     journal = {Canadian journal of mathematics},
     pages = {612--624},
     year = {1987},
     volume = {39},
     number = {3},
     doi = {10.4153/CJM-1987-029-0},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CJM-1987-029-0/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Paterson, Alan L. T.
TI  - Contractive Representation Theory for the Unitary Group of C(X, M 2)
JO  - Canadian journal of mathematics
PY  - 1987
SP  - 612
EP  - 624
VL  - 39
IS  - 3
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CJM-1987-029-0/
DO  - 10.4153/CJM-1987-029-0
ID  - 10_4153_CJM_1987_029_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Paterson, Alan L. T.
%T Contractive Representation Theory for the Unitary Group of C(X, M 2)
%J Canadian journal of mathematics
%D 1987
%P 612-624
%V 39
%N 3
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CJM-1987-029-0/
%R 10.4153/CJM-1987-029-0
%F 10_4153_CJM_1987_029_0

[1] 1. Arveson, W., Representations of unitary groups, Preprint. Google Scholar

[2] 2. Bourbaki, N., Lie groups and Lie algebras, Part 1 (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1975). Google Scholar

[3] 3. de la Harpe, P., Moyennabilité du groupe unitaire et propriété P de Schwartz des algèbres de von Neumann in Algèbres d'opérateurs, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 725 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979), 220–227. Google Scholar

[4] 4. Fell, J. M. G., The structure of algebras of operator fields, Acta Math. 106 (1961), 233–280. Google Scholar

[5] 5. Massey, W. S., Algebraic topology: an introduction (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1967). Google Scholar

[6] 6. Naimark, M. A., Normed rings (Wolters-Noordhoff Publishing, Groningeen, 1970). Google Scholar

[7] 7. Paterson, A. L. T., Harmonic analysis on unitary groups, J. Functional Analysis 53 (1983), 203–223. Google Scholar

[8] 8. Robert, A., Introduction to the representation theory of compact and locally compact groups (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983). Google Scholar | DOI

[9] 9. Segal, I., The structure of a class of representations of the unitary group on a Hilbert space, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 5 (1957), 197–203. Google Scholar

[10] 10. Sugiura, M., Unitary representations and harmonic analysis (Halsted Press, New York, 1975). Google Scholar

[11] 11. Switzer, R. M., Algebraic topology — homotopy and homology (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975). Google Scholar | DOI

[12] 12. Želobenko, D. P., Compact Lie groups and their representations (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1973). Google Scholar | DOI

Cité par Sources :