Geodesic
Towards Minimal Binding Varieties of Lattices
Canadian journal of mathematics, Tome 36 (1984) no. 2, pp. 263-285

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press

By classical results of Ambrust and Schmidt, every monoid is isomorphic to the endomorphism monoid of an algebra. Thus if we want to investigate in which varieties (or generally, in a concrete category) each monoid is isomorphic to the endomorphism monoid of an algebra in this variety (or an object of this category) then the important role is played by the concept of a binding category (see the definition below). Moreover, as shows the Hedrlín-Kučera Theorem [13] if the set-theoretical assumption (M) holds (i.e., there is an infinite cardinal α such that each ultrafilter closed under α intersections is trivial) every concrete category can be fully embedded into any binding category. Other properties of binding categories are in [7, 11, 13]. A list of the most important binding categories and the properties of binding categories can be found in an excellent monograph [13]. 
Koubek, Václav. Towards Minimal Binding Varieties of Lattices. Canadian journal of mathematics, Tome 36 (1984) no. 2, pp. 263-285. doi: 10.4153/CJM-1984-017-3
@article{10_4153_CJM_1984_017_3,
     author = {Koubek, V\'aclav},
     title = {Towards {Minimal} {Binding} {Varieties} of {Lattices}},
     journal = {Canadian journal of mathematics},
     pages = {263--285},
     year = {1984},
     volume = {36},
     number = {2},
     doi = {10.4153/CJM-1984-017-3},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CJM-1984-017-3/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Koubek, Václav
TI  - Towards Minimal Binding Varieties of Lattices
JO  - Canadian journal of mathematics
PY  - 1984
SP  - 263
EP  - 285
VL  - 36
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CJM-1984-017-3/
DO  - 10.4153/CJM-1984-017-3
ID  - 10_4153_CJM_1984_017_3
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Koubek, Václav
%T Towards Minimal Binding Varieties of Lattices
%J Canadian journal of mathematics
%D 1984
%P 263-285
%V 36
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CJM-1984-017-3/
%R 10.4153/CJM-1984-017-3
%F 10_4153_CJM_1984_017_3

[1] 1. Adams, M. E. and Sichler, J., Cover set lattices, Can. J. Math. 32 (1980), 1177–1205. Google Scholar

[2] 2. Adams, M. E., Day, A. and Sichler, J., Small lattice varieties generated by cover set lattices, to appear. Google Scholar

[3] 3. Adams, M. E., Pigozzi, D. and Sichler, J., Endomorphisms of direct unions of bounded lattices, Archiv. Math. 36 (1981), 221–229. Google Scholar

[4] 4. Grätzer, G., General lattice theory (Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, 1978). Google Scholar | DOI

[5] 5. Grätzer, G. and Sichler, J., On the endomorphism semigroup (and category) of bounded lattices, Pacif. J. Math. 35 (1970), 639–647. Google Scholar

[6] 6. Hedrlm, Z. and Pultr, A., On full embeddings of categories of algebras, Illinois J. Math. 10 (1966), 392–406. Google Scholar

[7] 7. Hedrlín, Z. and Sichler, J., Any boundable binding category contains a proper class of mutually disjoint copies of itself Algebra Universalis 7 (1971), 97–103. Google Scholar

[8] 8. Jónsson, B., Algebras whose congruence lattices are distributive, Math. Scan. 21 (1967), 110–121. Google Scholar

[9] 9. Koubek, V., Graphs with given subgraphs represent all categories, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae 18 (1977), 115–127. Google Scholar

[10] 10. Koubek, V., Graphs with given subgraphs represent all categories II, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae 79 (1978), 249–264. Google Scholar

[11] 11. Koubek, V. and Sichler, J., Preservation properties of full embeddings, to appear. Google Scholar

[12] 12. Mendelsohn, E., On technique for representing semigroups and endomorphism semigroups oj graphs with given properties, Semigroup Forum 4 (1972), 283–294. Google Scholar

[13] 13. Pultr, A. and Trnková, V., Combinatorial, algebraic and topological representations of groups, semigroups and categories (North Holland, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, 1980). Google Scholar

Cité par Sources :