Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press
Mueller, Bruno J. The Classification of Algebras by Dominant Dimension. Canadian journal of mathematics, Tome 20 (1968) no. 1, pp. 398-409. doi: 10.4153/CJM-1968-037-9
@article{10_4153_CJM_1968_037_9,
author = {Mueller, Bruno J.},
title = {The {Classification} of {Algebras} by {Dominant} {Dimension}},
journal = {Canadian journal of mathematics},
pages = {398--409},
year = {1968},
volume = {20},
number = {1},
doi = {10.4153/CJM-1968-037-9},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CJM-1968-037-9/}
}
[1] 1. Bass, H., Infective dimension in Noetherian rings, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 102 (1962), 18–29. Google Scholar
[2] 2. Bourbaki, N., Elements de mathématique-. Algèbre (Paris, 1958), Chap. 8. Google Scholar
[3] 3. Cartan, H. and Eilenberg, S., Homologuai algebra (Princeton, 1956). Google Scholar
[4] 4. Curtis, C. W. and Jans, J. P., On algebras with a finite number of indecomposable modules, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 114 (1965), 122–132. Google Scholar
[5] 5. Eckmann, B. und Schopf, A., Tiber injektive Moduln, Arch. Math., 4 (1953), 75–78. Google Scholar
[6] 6. Eilenberg, S., Nagao, N., and Nakayama, T., On the dimension of modules and algebras IV, Nagoya Math. J., 10 (1956), 87–95. Google Scholar
[7] 7. Jans, J. P., Projective infective modules, Pacific J. Math., 9 (1959), 1103–1108. Google Scholar
[8] 8. Jans, J. P., Some generalizations of finite projective dimension, Illinois J. Math., 5 (1961), 334–344. Google Scholar
[9] 9. Kupisch, H., Symmetrische Algebren mit endlich vielen unzerlegbaren Darstellungen I, J. Reine Angew. Math., 219 (1965), 1–25. Google Scholar
[10] 10. Matlis, E., Injective modules over Noetherian rings, Pacific J. Math., 8 (1958), 511–528. Google Scholar
[11] 11. Mochizuki, H. Y., Finitistic global dimension for rings, Pacific J. Math., 15 (1965), 249–258. Google Scholar
[12] 12. Mochizuki, H. Y., On the double commutator algebra of QF-3 algebras, Nagoya Math. J., 25 (1965), 221–230. Google Scholar
[13] 13. Morita, K., Duality for modules and its applications to the theory of rings with minimum condition, Sci. Repts. Tokyo Kyoiku Daigaku, Sect. A, 6 (1958), 83–142. Google Scholar
[14] 14. Morita, K., On algebras for which every faithful representation is its own second commutator, Math. Z., 69 (1958), 429–434. Google Scholar
[15] 15. Morita, K., Category-isomorphisms and endomorphism rings of modules, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 108 (1962), 451–469. Google Scholar
[16] 16. Nakayama, T., On Frobeniusean algebras II, Ann. of Math., J$ (1941), 1–21.10.2307/1968984 Google Scholar | DOI
[17] 17. Nakayama, T., On algebras with complete homology, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg, 22 (1958), 300–307. Google Scholar
[18] 18. Tachikawa, H., A characterization of QF-3 algebras, Proc Amer. Math. Soc, 13 (1962), 701–703; 14 (1963), 995. Google Scholar
[19] 19. Tachikawa, H., Qn dominant dimension of QF-3 algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 112 (1964), 249–266. Google Scholar
[20] 20. Thrall, R. M., Some generalizations of quasi-Frobenius algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 64 (1948), 173–183. Google Scholar
[21] 21. Wall, D. W., Algebras with unique minimal faithful representations, Duke Math. J., 25 1958), 321–329. Google Scholar
Cité par Sources :