Virtual knot groups and almost classical knots
Fundamenta Mathematicae, Tome 238 (2017) no. 2, pp. 101-142.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Institute of Mathematics Polish Academy of Sciences

We define a group-valued invariant $\overline G_K$ of virtual knots $K$ and show that $VG_K=\overline G_K \mathbin{*_{\mathbb Z}\,} \mathbb Z^2,$ where $VG_K$ denotes the virtual knot group introduced by Boden et al. We further show that $\overline G_K$ is isomorphic to both the extended group $EG_K$ of Silver–Williams and the quandle group $QG_K$ of Manturov and Bardakov–Bellingeri. A virtual knot is called almost classical if it admits a diagram with an Alexander numbering, and in that case we show that $\overline G_K$ splits as $G_K*\mathbb Z$, where $G_K$ is the knot group. We establish a similar formula for mod $p$ almost classical knots and derive obstructions to $K$ being mod $p$ almost classical. Viewed as knots in thickened surfaces, almost classical knots correspond to those that are homologically trivial. We show they admit Seifert surfaces and relate their Alexander invariants to the homology of the associated infinite cyclic cover. We prove the first Alexander ideal is principal, recovering a result first proved by Nakamura et al. using different methods. The resulting Alexander polynomial is shown to satisfy a skein relation, and its degree gives a lower bound for the Seifert genus. We tabulate almost classical knots up to six crossings and determine their Alexander polynomials and virtual genus.
DOI : 10.4064/fm80-9-2016
Keywords: define group valued invariant overline virtual knots overline mathbin * mathbb mathbb where denotes virtual knot group introduced boden further overline isomorphic extended group silver williams quandle group manturov bardakov bellingeri virtual knot called almost classical admits diagram alexander numbering that overline splits k* mathbb where knot group establish similar formula mod nbsp almost classical knots derive obstructions being mod nbsp almost classical viewed knots thickened surfaces almost classical knots correspond those homologically trivial admit seifert surfaces relate their alexander invariants homology associated infinite cyclic cover prove first alexander ideal principal recovering result first proved nakamura nbsp using different methods resulting alexander polynomial shown satisfy skein relation its degree gives lower bound seifert genus tabulate almost classical knots six crossings determine their alexander polynomials virtual genus

Hans U. Boden 1 ; Robin Gaudreau 1 ; Eric Harper 1 ; Andrew J. Nicas 1 ; Lindsay White 1

1 Mathematics & Statistics McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada
@article{10_4064_fm80_9_2016,
     author = {Hans U. Boden and Robin Gaudreau and Eric Harper and Andrew J. Nicas and Lindsay White},
     title = {Virtual knot groups and almost classical knots},
     journal = {Fundamenta Mathematicae},
     pages = {101--142},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {238},
     number = {2},
     year = {2017},
     doi = {10.4064/fm80-9-2016},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4064/fm80-9-2016/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hans U. Boden
AU  - Robin Gaudreau
AU  - Eric Harper
AU  - Andrew J. Nicas
AU  - Lindsay White
TI  - Virtual knot groups and almost classical knots
JO  - Fundamenta Mathematicae
PY  - 2017
SP  - 101
EP  - 142
VL  - 238
IS  - 2
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4064/fm80-9-2016/
DO  - 10.4064/fm80-9-2016
LA  - en
ID  - 10_4064_fm80_9_2016
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Hans U. Boden
%A Robin Gaudreau
%A Eric Harper
%A Andrew J. Nicas
%A Lindsay White
%T Virtual knot groups and almost classical knots
%J Fundamenta Mathematicae
%D 2017
%P 101-142
%V 238
%N 2
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4064/fm80-9-2016/
%R 10.4064/fm80-9-2016
%G en
%F 10_4064_fm80_9_2016
Hans U. Boden; Robin Gaudreau; Eric Harper; Andrew J. Nicas; Lindsay White. Virtual knot groups and almost classical knots. Fundamenta Mathematicae, Tome 238 (2017) no. 2, pp. 101-142. doi : 10.4064/fm80-9-2016. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4064/fm80-9-2016/

Cité par Sources :