Geodesic
Composants of the horseshoe
Fundamenta Mathematicae, Tome 144 (1994) no. 3, pp. 231-241.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Institute of Mathematics Polish Academy of Sciences

The horseshoe or bucket handle continuum, defined as the inverse limit of the tent map, is one of the standard examples in continua theory as well as in dynamical systems. It is not arcwise connected. Its arcwise components coincide with composants, and with unstable manifolds in the dynamical setting. Knaster asked whether these composants are all homeomorphic, with the obvious exception of the zero composant. Partial results were obtained by Bellamy (1979), Dębski and Tymchatyn (1987), and Aarts and Fokkink (1991). We answer Knaster's question in the affirmative. The main tool is a very simple type of symbolic dynamics for the horseshoe and related continua.
DOI : 10.4064/fm-144-3-231-241

Christoph Bandt 1

1 
@article{10_4064_fm_144_3_231_241,
     author = {Christoph Bandt},
     title = {Composants of the horseshoe},
     journal = {Fundamenta Mathematicae},
     pages = {231--241},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {144},
     number = {3},
     year = {1994},
     doi = {10.4064/fm-144-3-231-241},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4064/fm-144-3-231-241/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Christoph Bandt
TI  - Composants of the horseshoe
JO  - Fundamenta Mathematicae
PY  - 1994
SP  - 231
EP  - 241
VL  - 144
IS  - 3
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4064/fm-144-3-231-241/
DO  - 10.4064/fm-144-3-231-241
LA  - en
ID  - 10_4064_fm_144_3_231_241
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Christoph Bandt
%T Composants of the horseshoe
%J Fundamenta Mathematicae
%D 1994
%P 231-241
%V 144
%N 3
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4064/fm-144-3-231-241/
%R 10.4064/fm-144-3-231-241
%G en
%F 10_4064_fm_144_3_231_241
Christoph Bandt. Composants of the horseshoe. Fundamenta Mathematicae, Tome 144 (1994) no. 3, pp. 231-241. doi : 10.4064/fm-144-3-231-241. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4064/fm-144-3-231-241/

Cité par Sources :