On the upper tail of counts of strictly balanced subgraphs
The electronic journal of combinatorics, Tome 19 (2012) no. 1

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics website

Zbl
Let $X_G$ be the number of copies of $G$ in the Erdős-Rényi binomial random graph $\mathbb G(n,p)$. Janson, Oleszkiewicz and Ruciński proved that for every $t > 1$\begin{equation*}\exp \{-O_t( M^*_G \ln (1/p))\} \leq \mathbb{P}\{X_G \geq t\,\mathbb{E} X_G\} \leq \exp\{-\Omega_t(M^*_G)\},\end{equation*}where $M^*_G$ is a certain function of $n$ and $p$. For $G = K_3$ the logarithmic gap between the bounds was closed by Chatterjee and, independently, DeMarco and Kahn. We provide matching bounds for strictly balanced $G$, when $\mathbb{E} X_G \leq \ln n$. Also, we give matching bounds for $C_4$, $K_4$, and stars $K_{1,k}$ in a broader range of $\mathbb{E} X_G$. In particular, this improves some results of Janson and Ruciński for which the so called deletion method was used.
DOI : 10.37236/10
Classification : 05C80
Mots-clés : matching bounds for strictly balanced graphs, deletion method
Matas Šileikis. On the upper tail of counts of strictly balanced subgraphs. The electronic journal of combinatorics, Tome 19 (2012) no. 1. doi: 10.37236/10
@article{10_37236_10,
     author = {Matas \v{S}ileikis},
     title = {On the upper tail of counts of strictly balanced subgraphs},
     journal = {The electronic journal of combinatorics},
     year = {2012},
     volume = {19},
     number = {1},
     doi = {10.37236/10},
     zbl = {1243.05222},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.37236/10/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Matas Šileikis
TI  - On the upper tail of counts of strictly balanced subgraphs
JO  - The electronic journal of combinatorics
PY  - 2012
VL  - 19
IS  - 1
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.37236/10/
DO  - 10.37236/10
ID  - 10_37236_10
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Matas Šileikis
%T On the upper tail of counts of strictly balanced subgraphs
%J The electronic journal of combinatorics
%D 2012
%V 19
%N 1
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.37236/10/
%R 10.37236/10
%F 10_37236_10

Cité par Sources :