Comment on "Analogies between the geodetic number and the Steiner number of some classes of graphs"
Filomat, Tome 37 (2023) no. 2, p. 585
Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source eLibrary of Mathematical Institute of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts
It is proved by counter example that one of the theorems presented in [FILOMAT 29:8 (2015), 1781- 1788] does not always hold true. It is also proved by counter example that the necessary condition given in Theorem 3.7 [If diam(H) = 2, then s(K1 ⊙H) = s(H)] mentioned in the above cited paper does not hold true.
Classification :
05C12
Keywords: Distance, Geodetic number, Steiner distance, Steiner number
Keywords: Distance, Geodetic number, Steiner distance, Steiner number
J John. Comment on "Analogies between the geodetic number and the Steiner number of some classes of graphs". Filomat, Tome 37 (2023) no. 2, p. 585 . doi: 10.2298/FIL2302585J
@article{10_2298_FIL2302585J,
author = {J John},
title = {Comment on {"Analogies} between the geodetic number and the {Steiner} number of some classes of graphs"},
journal = {Filomat},
pages = {585 },
year = {2023},
volume = {37},
number = {2},
doi = {10.2298/FIL2302585J},
language = {en},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.2298/FIL2302585J/}
}
Cité par Sources :