On a dynamical model of happiness
Mathematical modelling of natural phenomena, Tome 18 (2023), article no. 10.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source EDP Sciences

It is now recognized that the personal well-being of an individual can be evaluated numerically. The related utility (“happiness”) profile would give at each instant t the degree u(t) of happiness. The moment-based approach to the evaluation of happiness introduced by the Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman establishes that the experienced utility of an episode can be derived from real-time measures of the pleasure and pain that the subject experienced during that episode. Since these evaluations consist of two types of utility concepts: instant utility and remembered utility, a dynamic model of happiness based on this approach must be defined by a delay differential equation. Furthermore, the application of the peak-end rule leads to a class of delay-differential equations called differential equations with maxima. We propose a dynamical model for happiness based on differential equations with maxima and provide results which shed some new light on important experimental observations. In particular, our model supports the U-shaped profile of the age-happiness curve, which is a widely observed pattern: well-being is high in youth, falls to a minimum in midlife (midlife crisis), and rises again in old age.
DOI : 10.1051/mmnp/2023008

Eduardo Liz 1 ; Sergei Trofimchuk 2

1 Departamento de Matemática Aplicada II, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain
2 Instituto de Matemáticas, Universidad de Talca, Casilla 747, Talca, Chile
@article{MMNP_2023_18_a10,
     author = {Eduardo Liz and Sergei Trofimchuk},
     title = {On a dynamical model of happiness},
     journal = {Mathematical modelling of natural phenomena},
     eid = {10},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {18},
     year = {2023},
     doi = {10.1051/mmnp/2023008},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1051/mmnp/2023008/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Eduardo Liz
AU  - Sergei Trofimchuk
TI  - On a dynamical model of happiness
JO  - Mathematical modelling of natural phenomena
PY  - 2023
VL  - 18
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1051/mmnp/2023008/
DO  - 10.1051/mmnp/2023008
LA  - en
ID  - MMNP_2023_18_a10
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Eduardo Liz
%A Sergei Trofimchuk
%T On a dynamical model of happiness
%J Mathematical modelling of natural phenomena
%D 2023
%V 18
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1051/mmnp/2023008/
%R 10.1051/mmnp/2023008
%G en
%F MMNP_2023_18_a10
Eduardo Liz; Sergei Trofimchuk. On a dynamical model of happiness. Mathematical modelling of natural phenomena, Tome 18 (2023), article  no. 10. doi : 10.1051/mmnp/2023008. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1051/mmnp/2023008/

[1] F.M. Andrews and J.P. Robinson, Measures of subjective well-being, in Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes’, edited by J.P. Robinson, P.R. Shaver and L.S. Wrightsman. Academic Press, San Diego (1991), pp. 61–114.

[2] R. Amundson Quality of life, disability, and hedonic psychology 2010 374 392

[3] J.A.D. Appleby, H. Wu Exponential growth and Gaussian-like fluctuations of solutions of stochastic differential equations with maximum functional 2008 012002

[4] D.D. Bainov and S. Hristova, Differential Equations with Maxima. Chapman Hall/CRC, New York (2011).

[5] N.R. Bantsur, O.P. Trofimchuk Existence and stability of the periodic and almost periodic solutions of quasilinear systems with maxima 1998 847 856

[6] J. Bentham, An Introduction to the Principle of Morals and Legislations (1789), reprinted Blackwell, Oxford (1948).

[7] D.G. Blanchflower Is happiness U-shaped everywhere? Age and subjective well-being in 145 countries 2021 575 624

[8] D.G. Blanchflower, A.J. Oswald Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? 2008 1733 1749

[9] D.G. Blanchflower and A.J. Oswald, Do humans suffer a psychological low in midlife? Two approaches (with and without controls) in seven data sets, in The Economics of Happiness, edited by M. Rojas. Springer, Cham (2019), pp. 439–453.

[10] P. Brickman, D. Coates, R. Janoff-Bulman Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? 1978 917 927

[11] I. Cojuharenco, D. Ryvkin Peak-End rule versus average utility: How utility aggregation affects evaluations of experiences 2008 326 335

[12] S. Dashkovskiy, S. Hristova, K. Sapozhnikova Stability properties of systems with maximum 2020 35 58

[13] A.M. Do, A.V. Rupert, G. Wolford Evaluations of pleasurable experiences: the peak-end rule 2008 96 98

[14] P. Dolan, Happiness by design: Change what you do, not how you think. Penguin Group, New York (2014).

[15] F.Y. Edgeworth, Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences (1881), reprinted M. Kelly, New York (1967).

[16] J. Elster and G. Loewenstein, Utility from memory and anticipation, in 'Choice over time. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (1992), pp. 213–234, Chapter 9.

[17] F. Feldman, What is this thing called happiness? Oxford University Press, New York (2010).

[18] B.L. Fredrickson Extracting meaning from past affective experiences: the importance of peaks, ends, and specific emotions 2000 577 606

[19] B.L. Fredrickson, D. Kahneman Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes 1993 45 55

[20] B.S. Frey, A. Stutzer What can economists learn from happiness research? 2002 402 435

[21] L. Graham, A.J. Oswald Hedonic capital, adaptation and resilience 2010 372 384

[22] A. Ivanov, E. Liz, S. Trofimchuk Halanay inequality, Yorke 3/2 stability criterion, and differential equations with maxima 2002 277 295

[23] D. Kahneman, Objective happiness, in Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, edited by D. Kahneman, E. Diener and N. Schwarz. The Russell Sage Foundation, New York (1999), pp. 3–25, Chapter 1.

[24] D. Kahneman, Experienced utility and objective happiness: A moment-based approach, in Choices, Values, and Frames, edited by D. Kahneman and A. Tversky. Cambridge University Press, New York (2000), Chapter 37.

[25] D. Kahneman, Evaluation by moments: Past and future, in Choices, Values, and Frames, edited by D. Kahneman and A. Tversky. Cambridge University Press, New York (2000), Chapter 38.

[26] D. Kahneman Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics 2003 1449 1475

[27] D. Kahneman, B.L. Fredrickson Ch. A. Schreiber and D.A. Redelmeier, When more pain is preferred to less: adding a better end 1993 401 405

[28] D. Kahneman, P.P. Wakker, R. Sarin Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility 1997 375 406

[29] R. Larsen and B. Fredrickson, Measurement issues in emotion research, in Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, edited by D. Kahneman, E. Diener and N. Schwarz. The Russell Sage Foundation, New York (1999), pp. 40–60, Chapter 3.

[30] M. Pinto, S. Trofimchuk Stability and existence of multiple periodic solutions for a quasilinear differential equation with maxima 2000 1103 1118

[31] A. Sherman, T. Shavit, G. Barokas A Dynamic model on happiness and exogenous wealth shock: the case of lottery winners 2020 117 137

[32] J.C. Sprott Dynamical models of happiness 2005 23 36

[33] J. Touboul, A. Romagnoni, R. Schwartz On the dynamic interplay between positive and negative affects 2017 897 936

[34] O. Trofymchuk, E. Liz, S. Trofimchuk The peak-end rule and its dynamic realization through differential equations with maxima 2023 507 536

[35] H.D. Voulov, D.D. Bainov On the asymptotic stability of differential equations with “maxima 1991 385 420

[36] A. Weiss, J.E. King, M. Inoue, T. Matsuzawa, A.J. Oswald Evidence for a midlife crisis in great apes consistent with the U-shape in human well-being 2012 19949 19952

[37] Yhappyliving, The Real Roots of Midlife Crisis (2016), document available in https://yhappiness.co.uk/post/136818075560/

Cité par Sources :