An efficient asymmetric removal lemma and its limitations
Forum of Mathematics, Sigma, Tome 13 (2025) no. 1, p. e38

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press

The triangle removal states that if G contains $\varepsilon n^2$ edge-disjoint triangles, then G contains $\delta (\varepsilon )n^3$ triangles. Unfortunately, there are no sensible bounds on the order of growth of $\delta (\varepsilon )$, and at any rate, it is known that $\delta (\varepsilon )$ is not polynomial in $\varepsilon $. Csaba recently obtained an asymmetric variant of the triangle removal, stating that if G contains $\varepsilon n^2$ edge-disjoint triangles, then G contains $2^{-\operatorname {\mathrm {poly}}(1/\varepsilon )}\cdot n^5$ copies of $C_5$. To this end, he devised a new variant of Szemerédi’s regularity lemma. We obtain the following results: • We first give a regularity-free proof of Csaba’s theorem, which improves the number of copies of $C_5$ to the optimal number $\operatorname {\mathrm {poly}}(\varepsilon )\cdot n^5$.• We say that H is $K_3$-abundant if every graph containing $\varepsilon n^2$ edge-disjoint triangles has $\operatorname {\mathrm {poly}}(\varepsilon )\cdot n^{\lvert V(H)\rvert }$ copies of H. It is easy to see that a $K_3$-abundant graph must be triangle-free and tripartite. Given our first result, it is natural to ask if all triangle-free tripartite graphs are $K_3$-abundant. Our second result is that assuming a well-known conjecture of Ruzsa in additive number theory, the answer to this question is negative.Our proofs use a mix of combinatorial, number-theoretic, probabilistic and Ramsey-type arguments.
Gishboliner, Lior; Shapira, Asaf; Wigderson, Yuval. An efficient asymmetric removal lemma and its limitations. Forum of Mathematics, Sigma, Tome 13 (2025) no. 1, p. e38. doi: 10.1017/fms.2024.68
@article{10_1017_fms_2024_68,
     author = {Gishboliner, Lior and Shapira, Asaf and Wigderson, Yuval},
     title = {An efficient asymmetric removal lemma and its limitations},
     journal = {Forum of Mathematics, Sigma},
     pages = {e38},
     year = {2025},
     volume = {13},
     number = {1},
     doi = {10.1017/fms.2024.68},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/fms.2024.68/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Gishboliner, Lior
AU  - Shapira, Asaf
AU  - Wigderson, Yuval
TI  - An efficient asymmetric removal lemma and its limitations
JO  - Forum of Mathematics, Sigma
PY  - 2025
SP  - e38
VL  - 13
IS  - 1
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/fms.2024.68/
DO  - 10.1017/fms.2024.68
ID  - 10_1017_fms_2024_68
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Gishboliner, Lior
%A Shapira, Asaf
%A Wigderson, Yuval
%T An efficient asymmetric removal lemma and its limitations
%J Forum of Mathematics, Sigma
%D 2025
%P e38
%V 13
%N 1
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/fms.2024.68/
%R 10.1017/fms.2024.68
%F 10_1017_fms_2024_68

[1] Alon, N., ‘Explicit Ramsey graphs and orthonormal labelings’, Electron. J. Combin. 1 (1994), Research Paper 12, 8 pp. Google Scholar | DOI

[2] Alon, N., ‘Testing subgraphs in large graphs’, Random Structures Algorithms 21 (2002), 359–370. Google Scholar | DOI

[3] Alon, N. and Krivelevich, M., ‘Testing -colorability’, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 15 (2002), 211–227. Google Scholar | DOI

[4] Alon, N. and Shapira, A., ‘A characterization of easily testable induced subgraphs’, Combin. Probab. Comput. 15 (2006), 791–805. Google Scholar | DOI

[5] Behrend, F. A., ‘On sets of integers which contain no three terms in arithmetical progression’, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 32 (1946), 331–332. Google Scholar PubMed | DOI

[6] Bollobás, P. Erdős, M. Simonovits, and Szemerédi, E., ‘Extremal graphs without large forbidden subgraphs’, Ann. Discrete Math. 3 (1978), 29–41. Google Scholar | DOI

[7] Conlon, D. and Fox, J., ‘Graph removal lemmas’, in Surveys in Combinatorics 2013 (London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser.) vol. 409 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2013), 1–49. Google Scholar

[8] Conlon, D., Fox, J., Sudakov, B. and Zhao, Y., ‘The regularity method for graphs with few 4-cycles’, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 104 (2021), 2376–2401. Google Scholar | DOI

[9] Csaba, B., ‘Regular decomposition of the edge set of graphs with applications’, Preprint, 2021, . Google Scholar | arXiv

[10] Duke, R. A., Lefmann, H. and Rödl, V., ‘A fast approximation algorithm for computing the frequencies of subgraphs in a given graph’, SIAM J. Comput. 24 (1995), 598–620. Google Scholar | DOI

[11] Erdős, P., ‘On extremal problems of graphs and generalized graphs’, Israel J. Math. 2 (1964), 183–190. Google Scholar | DOI

[12] Fox, J., ‘A new proof of the graph removal lemma’, Ann. of Math. (2) 174 (2011), 561–579. Google Scholar | DOI

[13] Fox, J. and Zhao, Y., ‘Removal lemmas and approximate homomorphisms’, Combin. Probab. Comput. 31 (2022), 721–736. Google Scholar | DOI

[14] Frieze, A. and Kannan, R., ‘Quick approximation to matrices and applications’, Combinatorica 19 (1999), 175–220. Google Scholar | DOI

[15] Gishboliner, L. and Shapira, A., ‘A generalized Turán problem and its applications’, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2020), 3417–3452. Google Scholar | DOI

[16] Goldreich, O., Goldwasser, S. and Ron, D., ‘Property testing and its connection to learning and approximation’, J. ACM 45 (1998), 653–750. Google Scholar | DOI

[17] Komlós, J., ‘Covering odd cycles’, Combinatorica 17 (1997), 393–400. Google Scholar | DOI

[18] Kövari, T., Sós, V. T., and Turán, P., ‘On a problem of K. Zarankiewicz’, Colloq. Math. 3 (1954), 50–57. Google Scholar | DOI

[19] Ruzsa, I. Z., ‘Solving a linear equation in a set of integers. I’, Acta Arith. 65 (1993), 259–282. Google Scholar | DOI

[20] Ruzsa, I. Z. and Szemerédi, E., ‘Triple systems with no six points carrying three triangles’, in Combinatorics (Proc. Fifth Hungarian Colloq., Keszthely, 1976), Vol. II, Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai vol. 18 (North-Holland, Amsterdam-New York, 1978), 939–945. Google Scholar

Cité par Sources :