Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press
@article{10_1017_fmp_2023_27,
author = {Wee Teck Gan and Gordan Savin},
title = {The {Local} {Langlands} {Conjecture} for $G_2$},
journal = {Forum of Mathematics, Pi},
publisher = {mathdoc},
volume = {11},
year = {2023},
doi = {10.1017/fmp.2023.27},
language = {en},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/fmp.2023.27/}
}
Wee Teck Gan; Gordan Savin. The Local Langlands Conjecture for $G_2$. Forum of Mathematics, Pi, Tome 11 (2023). doi: 10.1017/fmp.2023.27
[A] , The Endoscopic Classification of Representations. Orthogonal and Symplectic Groups, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, Vol. 61 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2013), xviii+590 pp.Google Scholar
[AB] and , ‘Reductive dual pair correspondence for complex groups’, J. Funct. Anal. 132(1) (1995), 1–42.Google Scholar | DOI
[AMS] , and , ‘Generalizations of the Springer correspondence and cuspidal Langlands parameters’, Manuscripta Math. 157(1–2) (2018), 121–192.Google Scholar | DOI
[AX] and , ‘The explicit local Langlands correspondence for’, Preprint, 2022, arXiv, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2208.12391.pdf.Google Scholar
[BM] and , ‘Whittaker models with an Iwahori-fixed vector’, Contemp. Math. 177 (1994), 101–105.Google Scholar | DOI
[BG] and , ‘The conjectural connections between automorphic representations and Galois representations’, in Automorphic Forms and Galois Representations, Vol. 1, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., Vol. 414 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2014), 135–187.Google Scholar | DOI
[BHV] , and , Kazhdan’s Property (T) (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2008).Google Scholar | DOI
[Ca] , ‘Local-global compatibility and the action of monodromy on nearby cycles’, Duke Math. J. 161(12) (2012), 2311–2413.Google Scholar | DOI
[CG] and , ‘The local Langlands conjecture for GSp(4) III: Stability and twisted endoscopy’, J. Number Theory 146 (2015), 69–133.Google Scholar | DOI
[CG1] and , ‘is unacceptable’, Preprint, 2023, .Google Scholar | arXiv
[CG2] and , ‘Triality and functoriality’, In preparation.Google Scholar
[CS] and , ‘Iwahori model of Bessel model spaces’, Proceedings of AMS 148(4) (2020), 1487–1497 Google Scholar | DOI
[C] , ‘Subgroups of Spin(7) or SO(7) with each element conjugate to some element of and applications to automorphic forms’, Doc. Math. 24 (2019), 95–161.Google Scholar | DOI
[CKPSS] , , and , ‘Functoriality for the classical groups’, Publ. Math. IHES. 99 (2004), 163–233.Google Scholar | DOI
[CZ1] and , ‘Local Langlands correspondence for even orthogonal groups via theta lifts’, Selecta Math. (N.S.) 27(5) (2021), Paper No. 88, 71 pp.Google Scholar | DOI
[CZ2] and , ‘Local Langlands correspondence for unitary groups via theta lifts’, Represent. Theory 25 (2021), 861–896.Google Scholar | DOI
[Co] , A Course in Functional Analysis , second edn., Graduate Texts in Mathematics , Vol. 96 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990).Google Scholar
[FS] and , ‘Geometrization of the local Langlands correspondence’, Preprint, 2021, .Google Scholar | arXiv
[G] , ‘Exceptional Howe correspondences over finite fields’, Compositio Math. 118(3) (1999), 323–344.Google Scholar | DOI
[GI] and , ‘The Shimura–Waldspurger correspondence for ’, Ann. Math. Second Series 188(3) (2018), 965–1016.Google Scholar | DOI
[GQT] , and , ‘The regularized Siegel–Weil formula (the second term identity) and the Rallis inner product formula’, Invent. Math. 198(3) (2014), 739–831.Google Scholar | DOI
[GS20] and , ‘An exceptional Siegel–Weil formula and poles of the Spin -function of ’, Compos. Math. 156(6) (2020), 1231–1261.Google Scholar | DOI
[GS23] and , ‘Howe duality and dichotomy for exceptional theta correspondence’, Invent. Math. 232(1) (2023), 1–78.Google Scholar | DOI
[GS24] and , ‘A theory of -factors for ’, Preprint, 2023, .Google Scholar | arXiv
[GT] and , ‘The local Langlands conjecture for ’, Ann. of Math. (2) 173(3) (2011), 1841–1882.Google Scholar | DOI
[GTW] and , ‘The local Langlands conjecture for , II: The case of inner forms’, Amer. J. Math. 136(3) (2014), 761–805.Google Scholar | DOI
[GeSh] and , Analytic Properties of Automorphic -functions, Perspectives in Mathematics, Vol. 6 (Academic Press, Boston, 1988).Google Scholar
[Gr95] ., ‘Basic conjugacy theorems for ’, Invent. Math. 121(2) (1995) 257–277.Google Scholar | DOI
[GrS1] and , ‘The dual pair , Canad. Math. Bull. 40(3) (1997), 376–384.Google Scholar | DOI
[GrS2] and , ‘Motives with Galois group of type G2: An exceptional theta-correspondence’, Compos. Math. 114 (1998), 153–217.Google Scholar | DOI
[HS] and , ‘Eisenstein series arising from Jordan algebras’, Canad. J. Math. 72(1) (2020), 183–201.Google Scholar | DOI
[HKT] , and , ‘A local Langlands parameterization for generic supercuspidal representations of -adic ’, Annales de l’ ENS 56(1) (2023), 257–286.Google Scholar
[HO] and , ‘On the tempered -functions conjecture’, Amer. J. Math. 135(3) (2013), 777–799.Google Scholar | DOI
[He] , ‘Une preuve simple des conjectures de Langlands pour sur un corps p-adique’, Invent. Math. 139(2) (2000), 439–455.Google Scholar | DOI
[HL] and , ‘On automorphic descent from to ’, J. European Math. Society, To appear.Google Scholar
[HPS] , and , ‘New dual pair correspondences’, Duke Math. J. 82 (1996), 447–471.Google Scholar | DOI
[HT] and , The Geometry and Cohomology of Some Simple Shimura Varieties, Annals of Mathematics Studies, Vol. 151 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2001), viii+276 pp. With an appendix by Vladimir G. Berkovich.Google Scholar
[ILM] , and , ‘On the formal degrees of square-integrable representations of odd special orthogonal and metaplectic groups’, Duke Math. J. 166(7) (2017), 1301–1348.Google Scholar | DOI
[K1] , ‘Regular supercuspidal representations’, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 32(4) (2019), 1071–1170.Google Scholar | DOI
[K2] , ‘Supercuspidal L-packets’, Preprint, 2019, .Google Scholar | arXiv
[KMSW] , , and , ‘Endoscopic classification of representations: inner forms of unitary groups’, Preprint, 2014, .Google Scholar | arXiv
[KS] and , ‘Galois representations for general symplectic groups’, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 25(1) (2023), 75–152.Google Scholar | DOI
[Li] , ‘On the classification of irreducible low rank unitary representations of classical groups’, Compositio Math. 71(1) (1989), 29–48.Google Scholar
[Mi] , ‘On -algebras with bounded trace’, Glasnik Mat. 8 (28) (1973), 7–22.Google Scholar
[MR] and , ‘Sur les paquets d’Arthur des groupes classiques et unitaires non quasi-déployés’, in Relative Aspects in Representation Theory, Langlands Functoriality and Automorphic Forms, Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 2221 (CIRM Jean-Morlet Ser., Springer, Cham, 2018), 341–361.Google Scholar | DOI
[M] , ‘Endoscopic classification of representations of quasi-split unitary groups’, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 235(1108) (2015), vi+248 pp.Google Scholar
[Ro] , ‘Decomposition of principal series for reductive -adic groups and the Langlands’ classification’, in Operator Algebras and Group Representations, Vol. II (Neptun, 1980), Monogr. Stud. Math., Vol. 18 (Pitman, Boston, MA, 1984), 86–94.Google Scholar
[SV] and , Periods and Harmonic Analysis on Spherical Varieties, Asterisque 396 (Math. Soc. France, Paris, 2017).Google Scholar
[SW] and , ‘Dichotomy for generic supercuspidal representations of ’, Compositio Math. (2010) 1–49.Google Scholar
[S] , ‘Automorphic Plancherel density theorem’, Israel J. Math. 192(1) (2012), 83–120.Google Scholar | DOI
[SZ] and , ‘Conservation relations for local theta correspondence’, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 28(4) (2015), 939–983.Google Scholar | DOI
[Ta1] , ‘On limits of characters of irreducible unitary representations’, Glasnik Mat. 23 (43) (1988), 15–25.Google Scholar
[Ta2] , ‘Geometry of dual spaces of reductive groups (non-Archimedean case)’, J. Analyse Math. 51 (1988), 139–181.Google Scholar | DOI
[TY] and , ‘Compatibility of local and global Langlands correspondences’, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 20(2) (2007), 467–493.Google Scholar | DOI
[Vo] , ‘Isolated unitary representations’, Automorphic Forms and Applications, IAS/Park City Math. Ser., Vol. 12 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2007), 379–398.Google Scholar
[Xu1] , ‘On lifting problem of –packets’, Compositio Math. 152(9) (2016), 1800–1850.Google Scholar | DOI
[Xu2] , ‘–packets of quasisplit and ’, Math. Ann. 370(1–2) (2018), 71–189.Google Scholar | DOI
[Xu3] , ‘Global L-packets of quasi-split and ’, American J. of Math., To appear.Google Scholar | arXiv
Cité par Sources :