Geodesic
Some Results involving Hypergeometric and E-Functions
Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 2 (1955) no. 3, pp. 132-138

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press

Recently R. S. Varma [11] gave the generalisationfor the Laplace transformSince(1) gives (2) when k = − m + 1⁄2.We shall represent (1) byand as usual, (2) will be denoted by 
Rathie, C. B. Some Results involving Hypergeometric and E-Functions. Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 2 (1955) no. 3, pp. 132-138. doi: 10.1017/S2040618500033207
@article{10_1017_S2040618500033207,
     author = {Rathie, C. B.},
     title = {Some {Results} involving {Hypergeometric} and {E-Functions}},
     journal = {Glasgow mathematical journal},
     pages = {132--138},
     year = {1955},
     volume = {2},
     number = {3},
     doi = {10.1017/S2040618500033207},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S2040618500033207/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Rathie, C. B.
TI  - Some Results involving Hypergeometric and E-Functions
JO  - Glasgow mathematical journal
PY  - 1955
SP  - 132
EP  - 138
VL  - 2
IS  - 3
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S2040618500033207/
DO  - 10.1017/S2040618500033207
ID  - 10_1017_S2040618500033207
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Rathie, C. B.
%T Some Results involving Hypergeometric and E-Functions
%J Glasgow mathematical journal
%D 1955
%P 132-138
%V 2
%N 3
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S2040618500033207/
%R 10.1017/S2040618500033207
%F 10_1017_S2040618500033207

[(1)] (1)Bromwich, T. J. I'A., Theory of Infinite Series,(1908), p. 457. Google Scholar

[(2)] (2)Goldstein, S., “Operational representation of Whittaker's confluent liypergeometric function and Weber's parabolic cylinder function”, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., (2), 34 (1932), 103–125. Google Scholar | DOI

[(3)] (3)Gupta, H. C., “On Operational calculus”, Proc. National Inst. Sci. India, (3), 14 (1948), 131–156. Google Scholar

[(4)] (4)Shanker, , Hari, , “On confluent hypergeometric functions which are Hankel transforms of each other”, Jour. Indian Math. Soc., 7 (1943), 63–67. Google Scholar

[(5)] (5)MacRobert, T. M., “Induction proofs of the relations between certain asymptotic expansions and corresponding generalised hypergeometric series”, Proc. Royal Soc. Edin., (1), 58 (1937), 1–13. Google Scholar

[(6)] (6)MacRobert, T. M., “Some formulae for the E-function”, Phil. Mag., (7), 31 (1941), 254–260. Google Scholar | DOI

[(7)] (7)McLachlan, N. W., and Humbert, P., Formulaire pour le Calcul symbolique, (1950), Fasc. 100. Google Scholar

[(8)] (8)Kumar, , Ram, , “A pair of functions which are Hankel transforms of each other”, Ganita, (2), 3 (1952), 79–84. Google Scholar

[(9)] (9)Rathie, C. B., “A study of a generalisation of the Laplace's Integral”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India, 21 (1952), 231–249. Google Scholar

[(10)] (10)Rathie, C. B., “Some infinite integrals involving E-functions”, Jour. Indian Math. Soc., (4), 17 (1953), 167–175. Google Scholar

[(11)] (11)Varma, R. S., “On a generalisation of Laplace Integral”, Proc Nat. Acad. Sci. India, 20 (1951). Google Scholar

[(12)] (12)Ragab, F. M., “Integrals of E-functions expressed in terms of E-functions”, Proc Glasg. Math. Ass., 1 (1953), 192. Google Scholar | DOI

Cité par Sources :