Geodesic
ORIENTED FLIP GRAPHS, NONCROSSING TREE PARTITIONS, AND REPRESENTATION THEORY OF TILING ALGEBRAS
Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 62 (2020) no. 1, pp. 147-182

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press

The purpose of this paper is to understand lattices of certain subcategories in module categories of representation-finite gentle algebras called tiling algebras, as introduced by Coelho Simões and Parsons. We present combinatorial models for torsion pairs and wide subcategories in the module category of tiling algebras. Our models use the oriented flip graphs and noncrossing tree partitions, previously introduced by the authors, and a description of the extension spaces between indecomposable modules over tiling algebras. In addition, we classify two-term simple-minded collections in bounded derived categories of tiling algebras. As a consequence, we obtain a characterization of c-matrices for any quiver mutation-equivalent to a type A Dynkin quiver. 
GARVER, ALEXANDER; MCCONVILLE, THOMAS. ORIENTED FLIP GRAPHS, NONCROSSING TREE PARTITIONS, AND REPRESENTATION THEORY OF TILING ALGEBRAS. Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 62 (2020) no. 1, pp. 147-182. doi: 10.1017/S0017089519000028
@article{10_1017_S0017089519000028,
     author = {GARVER, ALEXANDER and MCCONVILLE, THOMAS},
     title = {ORIENTED {FLIP} {GRAPHS,} {NONCROSSING} {TREE} {PARTITIONS,} {AND} {REPRESENTATION} {THEORY} {OF} {TILING} {ALGEBRAS}},
     journal = {Glasgow mathematical journal},
     pages = {147--182},
     year = {2020},
     volume = {62},
     number = {1},
     doi = {10.1017/S0017089519000028},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089519000028/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - GARVER, ALEXANDER
AU  - MCCONVILLE, THOMAS
TI  - ORIENTED FLIP GRAPHS, NONCROSSING TREE PARTITIONS, AND REPRESENTATION THEORY OF TILING ALGEBRAS
JO  - Glasgow mathematical journal
PY  - 2020
SP  - 147
EP  - 182
VL  - 62
IS  - 1
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089519000028/
DO  - 10.1017/S0017089519000028
ID  - 10_1017_S0017089519000028
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A GARVER, ALEXANDER
%A MCCONVILLE, THOMAS
%T ORIENTED FLIP GRAPHS, NONCROSSING TREE PARTITIONS, AND REPRESENTATION THEORY OF TILING ALGEBRAS
%J Glasgow mathematical journal
%D 2020
%P 147-182
%V 62
%N 1
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089519000028/
%R 10.1017/S0017089519000028
%F 10_1017_S0017089519000028

[1] Assem, I., Simson, D. and Skowroński, A., Elements of the representation theory of associative algebras: Techniques of representation theory (London Mathematical Society Student Texts 65), vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006). Google Scholar | DOI

[2] Baur, K. and Coelho Simões, R., A geometric model for the module category of a gentle algebra. arXiv:1803.05802 (2018). Google Scholar

[3] Bridgeland, T., Stability conditions on triangulated categories. Ann. of Math. (2) (2) (2007), 317–345. Google Scholar

[4] Brüstle, T., Douville, G., Mousavand, K., Thomas, H. and Yıldrm, E., On the combinatorics of gentle algebras. arXiv:1707.07665 (2017). Google Scholar

[5] Brüstle, T. and Yang, D., Ordered exchange graphs. Adv. Rep. Theor. Algeb. (ICRA Bielefeld 2012). (2013), 135–193. Google Scholar | DOI

[6] Buan, A. B., Marsh, R., Reineke, M., Reiten, I. and Todorov, G., Tilting theory and cluster combinatorics. Adv. Math. 204(2) (2006), 572–618. Google Scholar | DOI

[7] Caldero, P., Chapoton, F. and Schiffler, R., Quivers with relations arising from clusters (A case). Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358(3) (2006), 1347–1364. Google Scholar | DOI

[8] Canacki, I. and Schroll, S., Extensions in Jacobian algebras and cluster categories of marked surfaces. Adv. Math.313 (2017), 1–49. Google Scholar

[9] Canakci, I., Pauksztello, D. and Schroll, S., Mapping cones in the bounded derived category of a gentle algebra. arXiv:1609.09688 (2016). Google Scholar

[10] Canakci, I., Pauksztello, D. and Schroll, S., On extensions for gentle algebras. arXiv:1707.06934 (2017). Google Scholar

[11] Chavez, A. N., c-vectors and dimension vectors for cluster-finite quivers. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. (2013), 1590–1600. Google Scholar

[12] Coelho Simões, R. and Parsons, M. J., Endomorphism algebras for a class of negative Calabi–Yau categories. J. Algeb.491 (2017), 32–57. Google Scholar | DOI

[13] Demonet, L., Algebras of partial triangulations. arXiv:1602.01592 (2016). Google Scholar

[14] Demonet, L., Iyama, O., Reading, N., Reiten, I. and Thomas, H., Lattice theory of torsion classes. arXiv:1711.01785 (2017). Google Scholar

[15] Derksen, H., Weyman, J. and Zelevinsky, A., Quivers with potentials and their representations I: mutations. Selecta Math. 14(1) (2008), 59–119. Google Scholar | DOI

[16] Fomin, S. and Zelevinsky, A., Cluster algebras I: foundations. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15(2) (2002), 497–529. Google Scholar | DOI

[17] Fomin, S. and Zelevinsky, A., Cluster algebras IV: coefficients. Comp. Math. 143(01) (2007), 112–164. Google Scholar | DOI

[18] Garver, A., Igusa, K., Matherne, J. P. and Ostroff, J., Combinatorics of exceptional sequences in type A. Electron. J. Combin. (in press). Google Scholar

[19] Garver, A. and Mcconville, T., Lattice properties of oriented exchange graphs and torsion classes. Algeb. Rep. Theor. (in press), 1–36. Google Scholar

[20] Garver, A. and Mcconville, T., Oriented flip graphs and noncrossing tree partitions. arXiv:1604.06009 (2016). Google Scholar

[21] Garver, A. and Mcconville, T., Oriented flip graphs of polygonal subdivisions and noncrossing tree partitions. J. Comb. Theor. Ser. A 158 (2018), 126–175. Google Scholar | DOI

[22] Grätzer, G. and Wehrung, F., Lattice theory: special topics and applications. vol. 2 (Springer, Switzerland, 2016). Google Scholar | DOI

[23] Happel, D., Reiten, I. and Smalø, S. O., Tilting in Abelian categories and quasitilted algebras, vol. 575 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1996). Google Scholar | DOI

[24] Ingalls, C. and Thomas, H., Noncrossing partitions and representations of quivers. Compos. Math. 145(06) (2009), 1533–1562. Google Scholar

[25] Iyama, O., Reiten, I., Thomas, H. and Todorov, G., Lattice structure of torsion classes for path algebras. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 47(4) (2015), 639–650. Google Scholar

[26] Kashiwara, M. and Schapira, P., Sheaves on manifolds, vol. 292 (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013). Google Scholar

[27] Koenig, S. and Yang, D., Silting objects, simple-minded collections, t-structures and co-t-structures for finite-dimensional algebras. Doc. Math.19 (2014), 403–438. Google Scholar

[28] Kontsevich, M. and Soibelman, Y., Stability structures, motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants and cluster transformations. arXiv:0811.2435 (2008). Google Scholar

[29] Marks, F. and Št’Ovíček, J., Torsion classes, wide subcategories and localisations. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc.49(3) (2017), 405–416. Google Scholar | DOI

[30] Murphy, G. J.. Derived equivalence classification of m-cluster tilted algebras of type A. J. Algeb. 323(4) (2010), 920–965. Google Scholar | DOI

[31] Opper, S., Plamondon, P.-G. and Schroll, S., A geometric model for the derived category of gentle algebras, arXiv:1801.09659 (2018). Google Scholar

[32] Palu, Y., Pilaud, V. and P.-G. Plamondon., Non-kissing complexes and tau-tilting for gentle algebras. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. (in press). Google Scholar

[33] Reading, N., Clusters, Coxeter-sortable elements and noncrossing partitions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 359(12) (2007), 5931–5958. Google Scholar | DOI

[34] Rickard, J., Equivalences of derived categories for symmetric algebras. J. Algeb. 257(2) (2002), 460–481. Google Scholar | DOI

[35] Ringel, C. M., Representations of k-species and bimodules. J. Algeb. 41(2) (1976), 269–302. Google Scholar | DOI

[36] Speyer, D. and Thomas, H., Acyclic cluster algebras revisited, in Algebras, quivers and representations (vol. 8 of Abel Symp., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013), 275–298. Google Scholar | DOI

[37] Wald, B. and Waschbusch, J., Tame biserial algebras. J. Algeb. 95(2) (1985), 480–500. Google Scholar | DOI

[38] Woolf, J., Stability conditions, torsion theories and tilting. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 82(3) (2010), 663–682. Google Scholar

Cité par Sources :