Geodesic
A TOWER OF RIEMANN SURFACES WHICH CANNOT BE DEFINED OVER THEIR FIELD OF MODULI
Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 59 (2017) no. 2, pp. 379-393

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press

Explicit examples of both hyperelliptic and non-hyperelliptic curves which cannot be defined over their field of moduli are known in the literature. In this paper, we construct a tower of explicit examples of such kind of curves. In that tower there are both hyperelliptic curves and non-hyperelliptic curves. 
ARTEBANI, MICHELA; CARVACHO, MARIELA; HIDALGO, RUBEN A.; QUISPE, SAÚL. A TOWER OF RIEMANN SURFACES WHICH CANNOT BE DEFINED OVER THEIR FIELD OF MODULI. Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 59 (2017) no. 2, pp. 379-393. doi: 10.1017/S0017089516000227
@article{10_1017_S0017089516000227,
     author = {ARTEBANI, MICHELA and CARVACHO, MARIELA and HIDALGO, RUBEN A. and QUISPE, SA\'UL},
     title = {A {TOWER} {OF} {RIEMANN} {SURFACES} {WHICH} {CANNOT} {BE} {DEFINED} {OVER} {THEIR} {FIELD} {OF} {MODULI}},
     journal = {Glasgow mathematical journal},
     pages = {379--393},
     year = {2017},
     volume = {59},
     number = {2},
     doi = {10.1017/S0017089516000227},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089516000227/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - ARTEBANI, MICHELA
AU  - CARVACHO, MARIELA
AU  - HIDALGO, RUBEN A.
AU  - QUISPE, SAÚL
TI  - A TOWER OF RIEMANN SURFACES WHICH CANNOT BE DEFINED OVER THEIR FIELD OF MODULI
JO  - Glasgow mathematical journal
PY  - 2017
SP  - 379
EP  - 393
VL  - 59
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089516000227/
DO  - 10.1017/S0017089516000227
ID  - 10_1017_S0017089516000227
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A ARTEBANI, MICHELA
%A CARVACHO, MARIELA
%A HIDALGO, RUBEN A.
%A QUISPE, SAÚL
%T A TOWER OF RIEMANN SURFACES WHICH CANNOT BE DEFINED OVER THEIR FIELD OF MODULI
%J Glasgow mathematical journal
%D 2017
%P 379-393
%V 59
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089516000227/
%R 10.1017/S0017089516000227
%F 10_1017_S0017089516000227

[1] 1. Ackermann, P., Arithmetische Fuchssche Gruppen der Signatur (2;-), Dissertation (2005), Universität Dortmund. Google Scholar

[2] 2. Bujalance, E. and Turbek, P., Asymmetric and pseudo-symmetric hyperelliptic surfaces, Manuscr. Math. 108 (2002), 1–11. Google Scholar

[3] 3. Carocca, A., Gonzalez, V., Hidalgo, R. A. and Rodríguez, R., Generalized Humbert curves, Israel J. Math. 64 (1) (2008), 165–192. Google Scholar

[4] 4. Earle, C. J., On the moduli of closed Riemann surfaces with symmetries, in Advances in the theory of Riemann surfaces (Ahlfors, L. V. et al., Editors) (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1971), 119–130. Google Scholar

[5] 5. Earle, C. J., Diffeomorphisms and automorphisms of compact hyperbolic 2-orbifolds, in Geometry of Riemann surfaces (Gardiner, F., González-Diez, G. and Kourouniotis, C. Editors), London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 368 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2010), 139–155. Google Scholar

[6] 6. Gonzalez-Diez, G., Hidalgo, R. A. and Leyton, M., Generalized fermat curves, J. Algebra 321 (2009), 1643–1660. Google Scholar | DOI

[7] 7. Hidalgo, R. A., Non-hyperelliptic Riemann surfaces with real field of moduli but not definable over the reals, Arch. Math. 93 (2009), 219–222. Google Scholar

[8] 8. Hidalgo, R. A., Erratum: Non-hyperelliptic Riemann surfaces with real field of moduli but not definable over the reals, Arch. Math. 98 (2012), 449–45. Google Scholar

[9] 9. Hidalgo, R. A., Homology closed Riemann surfaces, Q. J. Math. 63 (2012), 931–952 Google Scholar

[10] 10. Huggins, B., Fields of moduli and fields of definition of curves, PhD Thesis (University of California, 2005). Google Scholar

[11] 11. Huggins, B., Fields of moduli of hyperelliptic curves, Math. Res. Lett. 14 (2) (2007), 249–262. Google Scholar

[12] 12. Koizumi, S., Fields of moduli for polarized Abelian varieties and for curves, Nagoya Math. J. 48 (1972), 37–55. Google Scholar

[13] 13. Kontogeorgis, A., Field of Moduli versus field of definition for cyclic covers of the projective line, J. Theorie des Nombres de Bordeaux 21 (2009), 679–693. Google Scholar | DOI

[14] 14. Kuribayashi, A. and Kimura, H., Automorphism groups of compact Riemann surfaces of genus five, J. Algebra 134 (1990), 80–103. Google Scholar

[15] 15. Kuribayashi, I. and Kuribayashi, A., Automorphism groups of compact Riemann surfaces of genera three and four, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 65 (3) (1990), 277–292. Google Scholar

[16] 16. Magaard, K., Shaska, T., Shpectorov, S. and Völklein, H., The locus of curves with prescribed automorphism group, Communications in arithmetic fundamental groups (Kyoto, 1999/2001). Surikaisekikenkyusho Kokyuroku No. 1267 (2002), 112–141. Google Scholar

[17] 17. Matsusaka, T., Polarized varieties, the field of moduli and generalized Kummer varieties of polarized abelian varieties, Amer. J. Math. 80 (1958), 45–82. Google Scholar | DOI

[18] 18. Shimura, G., On the field of rationality for an abelian variety, Nagoya Math. J. 45 (1971), 167–178. Google Scholar

[19] 19. Silhol, R., Moduli problems in real algebraic geometry, in Real Algebraic Geometry (Coste, M. et al., Editors) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1972), 110–119. Google Scholar

[20] 20. Weil, A., The field of definition of a variety, Amer. J. Math. 78 (1956), 509–524. Google Scholar

Cité par Sources :