TWO REMARKS ON PQε-PROJECTIVITY OF RIEMANNIAN METRICS
Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 55 (2013) no. 1, pp. 131-138

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press

We show that PQε-projectivity of two Riemannian metrics introduced in [15] (P. J. Topalov, Geodesic compatibility and integrability of geodesic flows, J. Math. Phys.44(2) (2003), 913–929.) implies affine equivalence of the metrics unless ε ∈ {0,−1,−3,−5,−7,. . .}. Moreover, we show that for ε=0, PQε-projectivity implies projective equivalence.
DOI : 10.1017/S0017089512000390
Mots-clés : 53B20, 53B35, 53C21, 53C22, 53C55, 37J35, 70H06
MATVEEV, VLADIMIR S.; ROSEMANN, STEFAN. TWO REMARKS ON PQε-PROJECTIVITY OF RIEMANNIAN METRICS. Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 55 (2013) no. 1, pp. 131-138. doi: 10.1017/S0017089512000390
@article{10_1017_S0017089512000390,
     author = {MATVEEV, VLADIMIR S. and ROSEMANN, STEFAN},
     title = {TWO {REMARKS} {ON} {PQ\ensuremath{\varepsilon}-PROJECTIVITY} {OF} {RIEMANNIAN} {METRICS}},
     journal = {Glasgow mathematical journal},
     pages = {131--138},
     year = {2013},
     volume = {55},
     number = {1},
     doi = {10.1017/S0017089512000390},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089512000390/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - MATVEEV, VLADIMIR S.
AU  - ROSEMANN, STEFAN
TI  - TWO REMARKS ON PQε-PROJECTIVITY OF RIEMANNIAN METRICS
JO  - Glasgow mathematical journal
PY  - 2013
SP  - 131
EP  - 138
VL  - 55
IS  - 1
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089512000390/
DO  - 10.1017/S0017089512000390
ID  - 10_1017_S0017089512000390
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A MATVEEV, VLADIMIR S.
%A ROSEMANN, STEFAN
%T TWO REMARKS ON PQε-PROJECTIVITY OF RIEMANNIAN METRICS
%J Glasgow mathematical journal
%D 2013
%P 131-138
%V 55
%N 1
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089512000390/
%R 10.1017/S0017089512000390
%F 10_1017_S0017089512000390

[1] 1.Apostolov, V., Calderbank, D. and Gauduchon, P., Hamiltonian 2-forms in Kähler geometry. I. General theory, J. Differ. Geom. 73 (3) (2006), 359–412. Google Scholar

[2] 2.Fedorova, A., Kiosak, V., Matveev, V. and Rosemann, S., The only Kähler manifold with degree of mobility ≥ 3 is (CP(n), g ), Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., doi: 10.1112/plms/pdr053 (2012). Google Scholar

[3] 3.Kiyohara, K. and Topalov, P. J., On Liouville integrability of h-projectively equivalent Kähler metrics, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 139 (2011), 231–242. Google Scholar

[4] 4.Levi-Civita, T., Sulle trasformazioni delle equazioni dinamiche, Ann. Di Math. 24 (1896), 255–300. Google Scholar

[5] 5.Matveev, V. S., Hyperbolic manifolds are geodesically rigid, Invent. Math. 151 (3) (2003), 579–609. Google Scholar

[6] 6.Matveev, V. S., Proof of the projective Lichnerowicz–Obata conjecture, J. Differ. Geom. 75 (3) (2007), 459–502. Google Scholar

[7] 7.Matveev, V. S. and Rosemann, S., Proof of the Yano-Obata conjecture for holomorph-projective transformations, arXiv:1103.5613 [math.DG], 2011. Google Scholar

[8] 8.Matveev, V. S. and Topalov, P. J., Integrability in the theory of geodesically equivalent metrics, J. Phys. A 34 (11) (2001), 2415–2433. Google Scholar | DOI

[9] 9.Mikes, J., Special F-planar mappings of affinely connected spaces onto Riemannian spaces, Mosc. Univ. Math. Bull. 49 (3) (1994), 15–21 (English; original in Russian; translated from Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. I (3) (1994), 18–24). Google Scholar

[10] 10.Mikes, J., Geodesic mappings of affine-connected and Riemannian spaces, J. Math. Sci. 78 (3) (1996), 311–333. Google Scholar | DOI

[11] 11.Mikes, J., Holomorphically projective mappings and their generalizations, J. Math. Sci. (New York) 89 (3) (1998), 1334–1353. Google Scholar | DOI

[12] 12.Otsuki, T. and Tashiro, Y., On curves in Kaehlerian spaces, Math. J. Okayama Univ. 4 (1954), 57–78. Google Scholar

[13] 13.Sinjukov, N. S., Geodesic mappings of Riemannian spaces (in Russian) (Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 1979, MR0552022, Zbl 0637.53020). Google Scholar

[14] 14.Tashiro, Y., On a holomorphically projective correspondence in an almost complex space, Math. J. Okayama Univ. 6 (1956), 147–152. Google Scholar

[15] 15.Topalov, P. J., Geodesic compatibility and integrability of geodesic flows, J. Math. Phys. 44 (2) (2003), 913–929. Google Scholar

Cité par Sources :