Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press
CHINDRIS, CALIN. ON THE GEOMETRY OF ORBIT CLOSURES FOR REPRESENTATION-INFINITE ALGEBRAS. Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 54 (2012) no. 3, pp. 629-636. doi: 10.1017/S0017089512000213
@article{10_1017_S0017089512000213,
author = {CHINDRIS, CALIN},
title = {ON {THE} {GEOMETRY} {OF} {ORBIT} {CLOSURES} {FOR} {REPRESENTATION-INFINITE} {ALGEBRAS}},
journal = {Glasgow mathematical journal},
pages = {629--636},
year = {2012},
volume = {54},
number = {3},
doi = {10.1017/S0017089512000213},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089512000213/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - CHINDRIS, CALIN TI - ON THE GEOMETRY OF ORBIT CLOSURES FOR REPRESENTATION-INFINITE ALGEBRAS JO - Glasgow mathematical journal PY - 2012 SP - 629 EP - 636 VL - 54 IS - 3 UR - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089512000213/ DO - 10.1017/S0017089512000213 ID - 10_1017_S0017089512000213 ER -
[1] 1.Assem, I., Simson, D. and Skowroński, A., Elements of the representation theory of associative algebras. Vol. 1: Techniques of representation theory, London Mathematical Society Student Texts, vol. 65 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006). Google Scholar | DOI
[2] 2.Bobiński, G. and Skowroński, A., Geometry of modules over tame quasi-tilted algebras, Colloq. Math. 79 (1) (1999), 85–118. Google Scholar | DOI
[3] 3.Bongartz, K., Algebras and quadratic forms, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 28 (3) (1983), 461–469. Google Scholar | DOI
[4] 4.Bongartz, K., Minimal singularities for representations of Dynkin quivers, Comment. Math. Helv. 69 (4) (1994), 575–611. Google Scholar | DOI
[5] 5.Chindris, C., Geometric characterizations of the representation type of hereditary algebras and of canonical algebras, Adv. Math. 228 (3) (2011), 1405–1434. Google Scholar | DOI
[6] 6.Derksen, H. and Weyman, J., The combinatorics of quiver representations. Preprint available at arXiv.math.RT/0608288 (2006). Google Scholar
[7] 7.Happel, D. and Vossieck, D., Minimal algebras of infinite representation type with preprojective component, Manuscripta Math. 42 (2–3) (1983), 221–243. Google Scholar | DOI
[8] 8.Keller, B., A-infinity algebras in representation theory, Representations of Algebra, vols. I and II (Beijing Norm. Univ. Press, Beijing, 2002), 74–86. Google Scholar
[9] 9.Keller, B., A-infinity algebras, modules and functor categories, Trends in Representation Theory of Algebras and Related Topics, Contemp. Math., vol. 406 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2006), 67–93. Google Scholar
[10] 10.Ringel, C. M., The braid group action on the set of exceptional sequences of a hereditary Artin algebra. Abelian Group Theory and Related Topics (Oberwolfach, 1993), Contemp. Math., vol. 171 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1994), 339–352. Google Scholar | DOI
[11] 11.Simson, D. and Skowroński, A., Elements of the representation theory of associative algebras. Vol. 2, London Mathematical Society Student Texts, vol. 71 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007). Tubes and concealed algebras of Euclidean type. Google Scholar
[12] 12.Zwara, G., Smooth morphisms of module schemes, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 84 (3) (2002), 539–558. Google Scholar | DOI
[13] 13.Zwara, G., Unibranch orbit closures in module varieties, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 35 (6) (2002), 877–895. Google Scholar | DOI
[14] 14.Zwara, G., An orbit closure for a representation of the Kronecker quiver with bad singularities, Colloq. Math. 97 (1) (2003), 81–86. Google Scholar | DOI
Cité par Sources :