ON SINGULARITIES OF QUIVER MODULI

DOMOKOS, MÁTYÁS

Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 53 (2011) no. 1, pp. 131-139

Résumé

Any moduli space of representations of a quiver (possibly with oriented cycles) has an embedding as a dense open subvariety into a moduli space of representations of a bipartite quiver having the same type of singularities. A connected quiver is Dynkin or extended Dynkin if and only if all moduli spaces of its representations are smooth.

Détail

DOI : 10.1017/S0017089510000583

Mots-clés : 16G20, 14L24

Bibliographie

[1] 1.Adriaenssens, J. and Le Bruyn, L., Local quivers and stable representations, Commun. Algebra 31 (2003), 1777–1797. Google Scholar

[2] 2.Bardsley, P. and Richardson, R. W., Étale slices for algebraic transformation groups in characteristic p, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., Ser. 3, 51 (1985), 295–317. Google Scholar

[3] 3.Bocklandt, R., Smooth quiver representation spaces, J. Algebra 253 (2000), 296–313. Google Scholar | DOI

[4] 4.Chindris, C., Orbit semi-groups and the representation type of quivers, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 213 (2009), 1418–1429. Google Scholar | DOI

[5] 5.Derksen, H. and Weyman, J., On the Littlewood–Richardson polynomials, J. Algebra 255 (2002), 247–257. Google Scholar | DOI

[6] 6.Derksen, H. and Weyman, J., The combinatorics of quiver representations, preprint arXiv:math.RT/0608288. Google Scholar

[7] 7.Domokos, M., Relative invariants of 3 × 3 matrix triples, Lin. Multilin. Algebra 47 (2000), 175–190. Google Scholar

[8] 8.Domokos, M., Kuzmin, S. G. and Zubkov, A. N., Rings of matrix invariants in positive characteristic, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 176 (2002), 61–80. Google Scholar

[9] 9.Domokos, M. and Lenzing, H., Moduli spaces for representations of concealed-canonical algebras, J. Algebra 251 (2002), 1–24. Google Scholar | DOI

[10] 10.Domokos, M. and Zubkov, A. N., Semi-invariants of quivers as determinants, Transform. Groups 6 (1) (2001), 9–24. Google Scholar

[11] 11.Domokos, M. and Zubkov, A. N., Semisimple representations of quivers in characteristic p, Algebra Represent. Theory 5 (2002), 305–317. Google Scholar | DOI

[12] 12.Engel, J. and Reineke, M., Smooth models of quiver moduli, Math. Z. 262 (2009), 817–848. Google Scholar | DOI

[13] 13.Kac, V. G., Infinite root systems, representations of graphs and invariant theory, Invent. Math. 56 (1980), 57–92. Google Scholar | DOI

[14] 14.King, A. D., Moduli of representations of finite dimensional algebras, Q. J. Math. Oxford, 45 (2) (1994), 515–530. Google Scholar | DOI

[15] 15.Kraft, H. and Riedtmann, Ch., Geometry of representations of quivers, in Representations of algebras (Webb, P., Editor), London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 116 (1986), 109–145. Google Scholar

[16] 16.Le Bruyn, L. and Procesi, C., Semisimple representations of quivers, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 317 (1990), 585–598. Google Scholar

[17] 17.Le Bruyn, L. and Teranishi, Y., Matrix invariants and complete intersections, Glasgow Math. J. 32 (1990), 227–229. Google Scholar | DOI

[18] 18.Luna, D., Slices étales, Bull. Soc. Math. France 33 (1973), 81–105. Google Scholar

[19] 19.Newstead, P. E., Introduction to moduli problems and orbit spaces, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Lectures on Mathematics and Physics, vol. 51 (Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, 1978). Google Scholar

[20] 20.Reineke, M., The use of geometric and quantum group techniques for wild quivers, Fields Inst. Commun. 40 (2004), 365–390. Google Scholar

[21] 21.Schofield, A., General representations of quivers, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 65 (3) (1992), 46–64. Google Scholar | DOI

[22] 22.Skowroński, A. and Weyman, J., The algebras of semi-invariants of quivers, Transform. Groups 5 (4) (2000), 361–402. Google Scholar | DOI