Geodesic
FINITE-GAP INTEGRATION OF THE SU(2) BOGOMOLNY EQUATIONS
Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 51 (2009) no. A, pp. 25-41

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press

The Atiyah–Drinfeld–Hitchin–Manin–Nahm (ADHMN) construction of magnetic monopoles is given in terms of the (normalizable) solutions of an associated Weyl equation. We focus here on solving this equation directly by algebro-geometric means. The (adjoint) Weyl equation is solved using an ansatz of Nahm in terms of Baker–Akhiezer functions. The solution of Nahm's equation is not directly used in our development.
DOI : 10.1017/S0017089508004758
Mots-clés : 35Q58, 14H70, 37J35 
BRADEN, H. W.; ENOLSKI, V. Z. FINITE-GAP INTEGRATION OF THE SU(2) BOGOMOLNY EQUATIONS. Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 51 (2009) no. A, pp. 25-41. doi: 10.1017/S0017089508004758
@article{10_1017_S0017089508004758,
     author = {BRADEN, H. W. and ENOLSKI, V. Z.},
     title = {FINITE-GAP {INTEGRATION} {OF} {THE} {SU(2)} {BOGOMOLNY} {EQUATIONS}},
     journal = {Glasgow mathematical journal},
     pages = {25--41},
     year = {2009},
     volume = {51},
     number = {A},
     doi = {10.1017/S0017089508004758},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089508004758/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - BRADEN, H. W.
AU  - ENOLSKI, V. Z.
TI  - FINITE-GAP INTEGRATION OF THE SU(2) BOGOMOLNY EQUATIONS
JO  - Glasgow mathematical journal
PY  - 2009
SP  - 25
EP  - 41
VL  - 51
IS  - A
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089508004758/
DO  - 10.1017/S0017089508004758
ID  - 10_1017_S0017089508004758
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A BRADEN, H. W.
%A ENOLSKI, V. Z.
%T FINITE-GAP INTEGRATION OF THE SU(2) BOGOMOLNY EQUATIONS
%J Glasgow mathematical journal
%D 2009
%P 25-41
%V 51
%N A
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089508004758/
%R 10.1017/S0017089508004758
%F 10_1017_S0017089508004758

[1] 1.Braden, H. W. and Enolski, V., Remarks on the complex geometry of 3-monopole (2006), 1–65, arXiv: math-ph/0601040. Google Scholar

[2] 2.Dubrovin, B. A., Completely integrable systems related to matrix operators and abelian varieties, Funk. Anal. Appl. 11 (4) (1977), 28–41. Google Scholar

[3] 3.Ercolani, N. and Sinha, A., Monopoles and Baker functions, Commun. Math. Phys. 125 (1989), 385–416. Google Scholar | DOI

[4] 4.Hitchin, N. J., Monopoles and Geodesics, Commun. Math. Phys. 83 (1982), 579–602. Google Scholar | DOI

[5] 5.Hitchin, N. J., On the Construction of Monopoles, Commun. Math. Phys. 89 (1983), 145–190. Google Scholar | DOI

[6] 6.Nahm, W., The construction of all self-dual multimonopoles by the ADHM method (World Scientific, Singapore, 1982). Google Scholar

[7] 7.Panagopoulos, H., Multimonopoles in arbitrary gauge groups and the complete su(2) two-monopole system, Phys. Rev. D 28 (2) (1983), 380–384. Google Scholar | DOI

[8] 8.Weinberg, E. J. and Piljin, Yi, Magnetic monopole dynamics, supersymmetry and duality, Phys. Rep. 438 (2007), 65–236, arXiv: hep-th/0609055. Google Scholar | DOI

Cité par Sources :