Geodesic
A note on comonotonic additivity
Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 38 (1996) no. 2, pp. 199-205

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press

The axiom of comonotonic independence for a preference ordering was introduced by Schmeidler [9]. It leads to the comonotonic additivity for the functional representing the preference ordering, which is necessarily a Choquet integral.The aim of this paper is to illuminate the concepts of comonotonicity, comonotonic independence and comonotonic additivity. For example the seemingly weaker condition of weak comonotonic independence used by Chateauneuf in [2] is seen to be equivalent to comonotonic independence. Comonotonic additivity is characterized as additivity on chains of sets. From this the characterization of Choquet integrals in [4], [1], [8] follows easily. 
Parker, June M. A note on comonotonic additivity. Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 38 (1996) no. 2, pp. 199-205. doi: 10.1017/S001708950003144X
@article{10_1017_S001708950003144X,
     author = {Parker, June M.},
     title = {A note on comonotonic additivity},
     journal = {Glasgow mathematical journal},
     pages = {199--205},
     year = {1996},
     volume = {38},
     number = {2},
     doi = {10.1017/S001708950003144X},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S001708950003144X/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Parker, June M.
TI  - A note on comonotonic additivity
JO  - Glasgow mathematical journal
PY  - 1996
SP  - 199
EP  - 205
VL  - 38
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S001708950003144X/
DO  - 10.1017/S001708950003144X
ID  - 10_1017_S001708950003144X
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Parker, June M.
%T A note on comonotonic additivity
%J Glasgow mathematical journal
%D 1996
%P 199-205
%V 38
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S001708950003144X/
%R 10.1017/S001708950003144X
%F 10_1017_S001708950003144X

[1] 1.Anger, B., Representation of capacities, Math. Ann. 229 (1977), 245–258. Google Scholar

[2] 2.Chateauneuf, A., On the use of capacities in modelling uncertainty aversion and risk aversion, J. Math. Economics 20 (1991), 343–369. Google Scholar | DOI

[3] 3.Choquet, G., Theory of capacities, Ann. Inst. Fourier 5 (1953–1954), 131–295. Google Scholar | DOI

[4] 4.Dellacherie, C., Quelques commentaires sur les prolongements de capacityés, Séminaire de Probabilités V, Strasbourg, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 191 (Springer-Verlag, 1970), 77–81. Google Scholar | DOI

[5] 5.Denneberg, D., Non–additive Measure and Integral(Kluwer, 1994). Google Scholar

[6] 6.Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D., Maxmin expected utility with non–unique prior, J. Math. Economics 18 (1989), 141–153. Google Scholar | DOI

[7] 7.Greco, G.,Sur la mesurabilité d'une fonction numerique par rapport á une famille d'ensembles, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova 65 (1981), 163–176. Google Scholar

[8] 8.Schmeidler, D., Integral representation without additivity, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 97 (1986), 255–261. Google Scholar | DOI

[9] 9.Schmeidler, D., Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity, Econometrica 57 (1989), 571–587. Google Scholar | DOI

[10] 10.Topsøe, F., On construction of measures, Proc. conference, Topology and Measure I, Zinnowitz, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt Univ., Greifswald, 1978, 343–381. Google Scholar

Cité par Sources :