Geodesic
Right fully idempotent rings need not be left fully idempotent
Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 37 (1995) no. 2, pp. 155-157

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press

All rings in this paper are associative but not necessarily with an identity. The ring R with an identity adjoined will be denoted by R#.To denote that I is an ideal (right ideal, left ideal) of a ring R we write I ◃ R (I <rR, I <1R).A ring R is called right (left) fully idempotent if for every I <rR (I<1R), I = I2.At the conference “Methoden der Modul und Ringtheorie” in Oberwolfach, Germany in 1993, J. Clark raised the question as to whether every right fully idempotent ring is left fully idempotent (see also [3]). A similar question was raised by S. S. Page in [5]. In this note we answer the questions in the negative.We start with some general observations most of which are perhaps well known. We include their simple proofs for completeness. 
Andruszkiewicz, R. R.; Puczyłowski, E. R. Right fully idempotent rings need not be left fully idempotent. Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 37 (1995) no. 2, pp. 155-157. doi: 10.1017/S0017089500031050
@article{10_1017_S0017089500031050,
     author = {Andruszkiewicz, R. R. and Puczy{\l}owski, E. R.},
     title = {Right fully idempotent rings need not be left fully idempotent},
     journal = {Glasgow mathematical journal},
     pages = {155--157},
     year = {1995},
     volume = {37},
     number = {2},
     doi = {10.1017/S0017089500031050},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089500031050/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Andruszkiewicz, R. R.
AU  - Puczyłowski, E. R.
TI  - Right fully idempotent rings need not be left fully idempotent
JO  - Glasgow mathematical journal
PY  - 1995
SP  - 155
EP  - 157
VL  - 37
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089500031050/
DO  - 10.1017/S0017089500031050
ID  - 10_1017_S0017089500031050
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Andruszkiewicz, R. R.
%A Puczyłowski, E. R.
%T Right fully idempotent rings need not be left fully idempotent
%J Glasgow mathematical journal
%D 1995
%P 155-157
%V 37
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089500031050/
%R 10.1017/S0017089500031050
%F 10_1017_S0017089500031050

[1] 1.Beľdar, K. I., Atoms in the “lattice” of radicals, Mat. Issled. 85 (1985), 21–31 (in Russian). Google Scholar

[2] 2.Beľdar, K. I., On questions of B. J. Gardner and A. D. Sands, J. Austral. Math. Soc., Ser. A 56 (1994), 314–319. Google Scholar

[3] 3.Clark, J., On eventually idempotent rings, Rings, modules and radicals. Proceedings of the Hobart Conference held at the University of Tasmania, Hobart, August 1987, Ed. Gardner, B. J., Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series 204 (Longman, 1989), 34–40. Google Scholar

[4] 4.Goodearl, K. R., von Neumann Regular Rings, (Pitman, London, 1979). Google Scholar

[5] 5.Page, S. S., Stable rings, Canad. Math. Bull. 23 (1980), 173–178. Google Scholar | DOI

[6] 6.Puczylowski, E. R., Some questions concerning radicals of associative rings, Theory of radicals, Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai 61 (North Holland, 1993), 209–227. Google Scholar | DOI

Cité par Sources :