The range of a continuous linear functional over a class of functions defined by subordination
Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 32 (1990) no. 3, pp. 381-387

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press

Let Δ = {z ∈ C ⃒ ⃓z⃓ <1) and H(Δ) the set of analytic functions on Δ. We recall the definition of subordination between two functions, say ƒ and g, analytic on Δ: this means that f(0)= g(0) and there is a function ρ ∈ H (Δ) such that ρ(0) = 0, ⃒ ρ(z)⃒<1 if z ∈ Δ, and f(z) ≡ g(ρ(z)). Subordination between f and g will be denoted byf<g. The Hadamard product (or convolution) of two functions and in H(Δ)is the function f * g ∈ H(Δ)definedas f * g (z)= .
Fournier, Richard. The range of a continuous linear functional over a class of functions defined by subordination. Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 32 (1990) no. 3, pp. 381-387. doi: 10.1017/S0017089500009472
@article{10_1017_S0017089500009472,
     author = {Fournier, Richard},
     title = {The range of a continuous linear functional over a class of functions defined by subordination},
     journal = {Glasgow mathematical journal},
     pages = {381--387},
     year = {1990},
     volume = {32},
     number = {3},
     doi = {10.1017/S0017089500009472},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089500009472/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fournier, Richard
TI  - The range of a continuous linear functional over a class of functions defined by subordination
JO  - Glasgow mathematical journal
PY  - 1990
SP  - 381
EP  - 387
VL  - 32
IS  - 3
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089500009472/
DO  - 10.1017/S0017089500009472
ID  - 10_1017_S0017089500009472
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Fournier, Richard
%T The range of a continuous linear functional over a class of functions defined by subordination
%J Glasgow mathematical journal
%D 1990
%P 381-387
%V 32
%N 3
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089500009472/
%R 10.1017/S0017089500009472
%F 10_1017_S0017089500009472

[1] 1.Ahlfors, L., Conformal invariants (McGraw-Hill, 1973). Google Scholar

[2] 2.Brickman, L., MacGregor, T. H. and Wilken, D. R., Convex hulls of some classical families of univalent functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 156 (1971), 91–107. Google Scholar | DOI

[3] 3.Duren, P. L., Univalent functions (Springer Verlag, 1983). Google Scholar

[4] 4.Fournier, R., On integrals of bounded analytic functions in the closed unit disc, Complex Variables, 11 (1989), 125–133. Google Scholar

[5] 5.Hallenbeck, D. J. and MacGregor, T. H., Linear problems and convexity techniques in geometric function theory (Pitman, 1984). Google Scholar

[6] 6.Hallenbeck, D. J. and Ruscheweyh, St., Subordination by convex functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 52 (1975), 191–195. Google Scholar | DOI

[7] 7.Ruscheweyh, St. and Sheil-Small, T., Hadamard products of schlichtfunctions and the Pólya-Schoenberg conjecture, Comm. Math. Helvet., 48 (1973), 119–135. Google Scholar | DOI

Cité par Sources :