Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press
Koubek, Václav. Homomorphisms of (0, 1)-lattices with a given sublattice and quotient. Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 33 (1991) no. 2, pp. 159-170. doi: 10.1017/S0017089500008193
@article{10_1017_S0017089500008193,
author = {Koubek, V\'aclav},
title = {Homomorphisms of (0, 1)-lattices with a given sublattice and quotient},
journal = {Glasgow mathematical journal},
pages = {159--170},
year = {1991},
volume = {33},
number = {2},
doi = {10.1017/S0017089500008193},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089500008193/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Koubek, Václav TI - Homomorphisms of (0, 1)-lattices with a given sublattice and quotient JO - Glasgow mathematical journal PY - 1991 SP - 159 EP - 170 VL - 33 IS - 2 UR - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1017/S0017089500008193/ DO - 10.1017/S0017089500008193 ID - 10_1017_S0017089500008193 ER -
[1] 1.Adams, M. E. and Sichler, J., Homomorphisms of bounded lattices with a given sublattice, Arch. Math. Basel 30 (1978), 122–128. Google Scholar | DOI
[2] 2.Adams, M. E. and Sichler, J., Cover set lattices, Canad. J. Math. 32 (1980), 1177–1205. Google Scholar
[3] 3.Crawley, P. and Dilworth, R. P., Algebraic theory of lattices (Prentice-Hall, 1973). Google Scholar
[4] 4.Dean, R. A., Free lattices generated by partially ordered sets and preserving bounds, Canad. J. Math. 16 (1964), 136–148. Google Scholar | DOI
[5] 5.Goralčik, P., Koubek, V. and Sichler, J., Universal varieties of (0, l)-lattices, Canad. J. Math. 42 (1990), 470–490. Google Scholar
[6] 6.Grätzer, G., General lattice theory (Academic Press, 1978). Google Scholar
[7] 7.Grätzer, G. and Sichler, J., On the endomorphism semigroup (and category) of bounded lattices, Pacific J. Math. 35 (1970), 639–647. Google Scholar
[8] 8.Hedrlin, Z. and Sichler, J., Any boundable binding category contains a proper class of mutually disjoint copies of itself, Algebra Universalis 1 (1971), 97–103. Google Scholar
[9] 9.Koubek, V., Graphs with given subgraphs represent all categories, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 18 (1977), 115–127. Google Scholar
[10] 10.Koubek, V., Graphs with given subgraphs represent all categories II, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 19 (1978), 249–263. Google Scholar
[11] 11.Koubek, V., Towards minimal binding varieties of lattices, Canad. J. Math. 36 (1984), 263–285. Google Scholar
[12] 12.Koubek, V. and Sichler, J., Universality of small lattice varieties, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 91 (1984), 19–24. Google Scholar | DOI
[13] 13.Koubek, V. and Sichler, J., Quotients of rigid (0, l)-lattices, Arch. Math. Basel 44 (1985), 403–412. Google Scholar | DOI
[14] 14.Lakser, H., Normal and canonical representations in free products of lattices, Canad. J. Math. 22 (1970), 394–402. Google Scholar
[15] 15.Pultr, A. and Trnková, V., Combinatorial, algebraic and topological representations of groups, semigroups and categories (North Holland, 1980). Google Scholar
[16] 16.Taylor, W., Review of seventeen papers on equational compactness, J. Symbolic Logic 40 (1975), 88–92. Google Scholar
Cité par Sources :