Lattice subgroups of free congruence groups

Mason, A. W.

Glasgow mathematical journal, Tome 10 (1969) no. 2, pp. 106-115

Résumé

Let Г(1) denote the homogeneous modular group of 2 × 2 matrices with integral entries and determinant 1. Let (1) be the inhomogeneous modular group of 2 × 2 integral matrices of determinant 1 in which a matrix is identified with its negative. (N), the principal congruence subgroup of level N, is the subgroup of (1) consisting of all T ∈ (1) for which T ≡ ± I (mod N), where N is a positive integer and I is the identity matrix. A subgroup of (1) is said to be a congruence group of level N if contains (N) and N is the least such integer. Similarly, we denote by Г(N) the principal congruence subgroup of level N of Г(1), consisting of those T∈(1) for which T ≡ I (mod N), and we say that a sub group of Г(1) is a congruence group of level N if contains Г (N) and N is minimal with respect to this property. In a recent paper [9] Rankin considered lattice subgroups of a free congruence subgroup of rank n of (1). By a lattice subgroup of we mean a subgroup of which contains the commutator group . In particular, he showed that, if is a congruence group of level N and if is a lattice congruence subgroup of of level qr, where r is the largest divisor of qr prime to N, then N divides q and r divides 12. He then posed the problem of finding an upper bound for the factor q. It is the purpose of this paper to find such an upper bound for q. We also consider bounds for the factor r.

Détail

DOI : 10.1017/S0017089500000641

Bibliographie

[1] 1.Fricke, R., Über die Substitutionsgruppen, welche zu den aus Legendre'schen Integralmodul κ2(ω) gezogenen Wuhrzeln gehören, Math. Ann. 28 (1887), 99–118. Google Scholar | DOI

[2] 2.Lehner, Joseph, Discontinuous groups and automorphic functions, Mathematical Surveys, No. VIII, American Mathematical Society (Providence, R.I., 1964). Google Scholar | DOI

[3] 3.van Lint, J. H., On the multiplier system of the Riemann-Dedekind function ν, Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser. A 61 (=Indag. Math. 20) (1958), 522–527. Google Scholar | DOI

[4] 4.McQuillan, D. L., Classification of normal congruence subgroups of the modular group, Amer. J. Math. 87 (1965), 285–296. Google Scholar | DOI

[5] 5.Newman, M., Free subgroups and normal subgroups of the modular group, Illinois J. Math. 8 (1964), 262–265. Google Scholar | DOI

[6] 6.Newman, M., On a problem of G. Sansone, Ann. Mat. pura appl. 65 (1964), 27–34. Google Scholar | DOI

[7] 7.Newman, M. and Smart, J. R., Modulary groups of t × t matrices, Duke Math. J. 30 (1963), 253–257. Google Scholar | DOI

[8] 8.Pick, G., Über gewisse ganzzahlige lineare Substitutionen, welche sich nicht durch algebraische Congruenzen erklären lassen, Math. Ann. 28 (1887), 119–124. Google Scholar | DOI

[9] 9.Rankin, R. A., Lattice subgroups of free congruence groups, Inventiones Math. 2 (1967), 215–221. Google Scholar | DOI

[10] 10.Reiner, I., Normal subgroups of the unimodular group, Illinois J. Math. 2 (1958), 142–144. Google Scholar | DOI

[11] 11.Wohlfahrt, K., An extension of F. Klein's level concept, Illinois J. Math. 8 (1964), 529–535. Google Scholar | DOI