Geodesic
Comparison of boundary smoothness for an analytic function and for its modulus in the case of the upper half-plane
Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Investigations on linear operators and function theory. Part 44, Tome 447 (2016), pp. 75-89
Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Math-Net.Ru

Voir la notice du chapitre de livre

The results of a recent paper by A. V. Vasin, S. V. Kislyakov, and the author are extended to the case of outer functions in the upper half-plane. As in the case of the disk, it can only be guaranteed that the smoothness of an outer function is at least one half as high as that of it modulus, but the quantitative manifestation of this effect is different – in particular, it depends on the position of the point at which smoothness is measured. 
@article{ZNSL_2016_447_a5,
     author = {A. N. Medvedev},
     title = {Comparison of boundary smoothness for an analytic function and for its modulus in the case of the upper half-plane},
     journal = {Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI},
     pages = {75--89},
     year = {2016},
     volume = {447},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/ZNSL_2016_447_a5/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - A. N. Medvedev
TI  - Comparison of boundary smoothness for an analytic function and for its modulus in the case of the upper half-plane
JO  - Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI
PY  - 2016
SP  - 75
EP  - 89
VL  - 447
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/ZNSL_2016_447_a5/
LA  - ru
ID  - ZNSL_2016_447_a5
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A A. N. Medvedev
%T Comparison of boundary smoothness for an analytic function and for its modulus in the case of the upper half-plane
%J Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI
%D 2016
%P 75-89
%V 447
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/ZNSL_2016_447_a5/
%G ru
%F ZNSL_2016_447_a5
A. N. Medvedev. Comparison of boundary smoothness for an analytic function and for its modulus in the case of the upper half-plane. Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Investigations on linear operators and function theory. Part 44, Tome 447 (2016), pp. 75-89. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/ZNSL_2016_447_a5/

[1] J. Brennan, “Approximation in the mean by polynomials on non Caratheodory domains”, Ark. Mat., 15:1 (1977), 117–168 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[2] K. M. Dyakonov, “The moduli of holomorphic functions in Lipschitz spaces”, Michigan Math. J., 44 (1997), 139–147 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[3] V. P. Khavin, “Obobschenie teoremy Privalova–Zigmunda o module nepreryvnosti sopryazhennoi funktsii”, Izv. Akad. nauk Armyanskoi SSR, seriya Matematika, 1971, no. 6, 252–258, 265–287 | MR | Zbl

[4] K. Hoffman, Banach spaces of analytic functions, Prentice Hall, Engelewood Cliffs, NJ, 1962 | MR | Zbl

[5] A. N. Medvedev, “Padenie gladkosti vneshnei funktsii v sravnenii s gladkostyu ee modulya pri dopolnitelnykh ogranicheniyakh na velichinu granichnoi funktsii”, Zap. nauchn. sem. POMI, 434, 2015, 101–115

[6] N. A. Shirokov, “Dostatochnye usloviya dlya geldorovskoi gladkosti funktsii”, Algebra i analiz, 25:3 (2013), 200–206 | MR | Zbl

[7] S. Spanne, “Some function spaces defined using the mean oscillation over cubes”, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa – Classe di Scienze, 19:4 (1965), 593–608 | MR | Zbl

[8] A. V. Vasin, S. V. Kislyakov, A. N. Medvedev, “Lokalnaya gladkost analiticheskoi funktsii v sravnenii s gladkostyu ee modulya”, Algebra i analiz, 25:3 (2013), 52–85 | MR | Zbl