An Overview of Some Truth Maintenance Systems
Yugoslav journal of operations research, Tome 5 (1995) no. 1, p. 65
Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source eLibrary of Mathematical Institute of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts
Many treatments of formal and informal reasoning in mathematical logic
and artificial intelligence have been shaped in large part by u seldom acknowledged
view: the view that the process of reasoning is the process of deriving new knowledge
from old, the process of discovering new truths contained in known truths. The basic
problem with the conventional view of reasoning stems from the monotonicity of the
reasoning process. The truth maintenance systems solve this problem. Doyle' s Truth
Maintenance System - TMS, de Kleer's assumption-based Truth Maintenance System
- ATMS, ART's viewpoint mechanism, and BEST's context mechanism - MEKON will
be described in this paper. TMS and ATMS represent two different approaches in the
truth maintenance. and some variations of these basic ideas are implemented in many
other truth maintenance systems. ART's viewpoint mechanism and MEKON are
similar to the ATMS, but they can solve some problems that neither TMS nor ATMS
can solve.
Keywords:
Expert systems, hypothetical reasoning, non-monotonic reasoning, time-state reasoning, truth maintenance
@article{YJOR_1995_5_1_a6,
author = {Mladen Stanojevi\'c and Du\v{s}an Vela\v{s}evi\'c},
title = {An {Overview} of {Some} {Truth} {Maintenance} {Systems}},
journal = {Yugoslav journal of operations research},
pages = {65 },
year = {1995},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
language = {en},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/YJOR_1995_5_1_a6/}
}
Mladen Stanojević; Dušan Velašević. An Overview of Some Truth Maintenance Systems. Yugoslav journal of operations research, Tome 5 (1995) no. 1, p. 65 . http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/YJOR_1995_5_1_a6/