Geodesic
Survey on approaches and practical areas of human activity recognition application
Vestnik Ûžno-Uralʹskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriâ Vyčislitelʹnaâ matematika i informatika, Tome 8 (2019) no. 3, pp. 43-57 Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Math-Net.Ru

Voir la notice de l'article

Human activity recognition is one of the relevant fields of research in machine learning since recognition results are necessary for solving many practical problems. The article provides a survey on approaches and areas of practical application of methods for human activity recognition. The sensors used for human activity recognition are considered, and the criteria for their selection are presented. Possible solutions to the problem of choosing the location and orientation of wearable sensors are presented. The main stages of human activity recognition are discussed in the article. Extracted features and methods of their selection to increase the accurate classification of human activity recognition and reduce computational complexity by cutting down the number of features are presented. The advantages and disadvantages of popular classification methods are formulated. The metrics used to evaluate the quality of learning classification models are considered. The most commonly used quality metric is the error curve. Practical tasks in which the results of human activity recognition are needed are also presented. The main areas of human activity recognition application are medicine, manufacturing, fitness, and safety of people. In conclusion, possible future research directions are presented.
Keywords: pattern recognition, machine learning, types of human physical activity. 
@article{VYURV_2019_8_3_a2,
     author = {E. S. Tarantova and K. V. Makarov and A. A. Orlov},
     title = {Survey on approaches and practical areas of human activity recognition application},
     journal = {Vestnik \^U\v{z}no-Uralʹskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seri\^a Vy\v{c}islitelʹna\^a matematika i informatika},
     pages = {43--57},
     year = {2019},
     volume = {8},
     number = {3},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VYURV_2019_8_3_a2/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - E. S. Tarantova
AU  - K. V. Makarov
AU  - A. A. Orlov
TI  - Survey on approaches and practical areas of human activity recognition application
JO  - Vestnik Ûžno-Uralʹskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriâ Vyčislitelʹnaâ matematika i informatika
PY  - 2019
SP  - 43
EP  - 57
VL  - 8
IS  - 3
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VYURV_2019_8_3_a2/
LA  - ru
ID  - VYURV_2019_8_3_a2
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A E. S. Tarantova
%A K. V. Makarov
%A A. A. Orlov
%T Survey on approaches and practical areas of human activity recognition application
%J Vestnik Ûžno-Uralʹskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriâ Vyčislitelʹnaâ matematika i informatika
%D 2019
%P 43-57
%V 8
%N 3
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VYURV_2019_8_3_a2/
%G ru
%F VYURV_2019_8_3_a2
E. S. Tarantova; K. V. Makarov; A. A. Orlov. Survey on approaches and practical areas of human activity recognition application. Vestnik Ûžno-Uralʹskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriâ Vyčislitelʹnaâ matematika i informatika, Tome 8 (2019) no. 3, pp. 43-57. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VYURV_2019_8_3_a2/

[1] N. O. Baev, “Support Vector Machines in Image Classification”, International Journal of Information Technologies and Energy Efficiency, 2017, no. 2, 17–21

[2] E. S. Tarantova, K. V. Makarov, “Feature Selection and Choosing the Method for Physical Activity Classification in the Task of Building the Telerehabilitation System.News of South-West State University. Series: Management, Computer Engineering, Computer Science”, Medical Instrument, 8:1 (2018), 54–62

[3] K. Altun, B. Barshan, “Human Activity Recognition Using Inertial/Magnetic Sensor Units”, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, 38–51 | DOI

[4] M. Bachlin, M. Kusserow, G. Troster, et al., “Ski Jump Analysis of an Olympic Champion with Wearable Acceleration Sensors”, International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC) (Oct. 10–13, 2010, Seoul, South Korea), 10–13 | DOI

[5] A. Bayat, M. Pomplun, D. A. Tran, “A Study on Human Activity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data from Smartphones”, Affiliated Workshops, The 9th International Conference on Future Networks and Communications (FNC'14), The 11th International Conference on Mobile Systems and Pervasive Computing (MobiSPC'14) (Procedia Computer Science, Aug. 17–20, 2014, Niagara Falls, Canada), 2014, 450–457 | DOI

[6] F. Bremond, M. Thonnat, M. Zuniga, “Video-understanding Framework for Automatic Behavior Recognition”, Behavior Research Methods, 38 (2006), 416–426 | DOI

[7] A. Bulling, U. Blanke, B. Schiele, “A Tutorial on Human Activity Recognition Using Body-worn Inertial Sensors”, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 46 (2014), 1–33 | DOI

[8] N. A. Capela, E. D. Lemaire, N. Baddour, “Feature Selection for Wearable SmartphoneBased Human Activity Recognition with Able Bodied, Elderly, and Stroke Patients”, PLoS ONE, 10 (2015) | DOI

[9] G. Chandrashekar, F. Sahin, “A Survey on Feature Selection Methods”, Computers and Electrical Engineering, 40 (2014), 16–28 | DOI

[10] S. Dernbach, B. Das, N. C. Krishnan, et al., “Simple and Complex Activity Recognition through Smart Phones”, 2012 Eighth International Conference on Intelligent Environments (Jun 26–29 2012, Guanajuato, Mexico) | DOI

[11] K. Du, D. Zhang, M. W. Musa, et al., “Handling Activity Conflicts in Reminding System for Elders with Dementia”, 2008 Second International Conference on Future Generation Communication and Networking (Dec 13–15, 2008, Hainan Island, China), 416–421 | DOI

[12] J. Favela, M. Tentory, L. A. Castro, et al., “Activity Recognition for Context-aware Hospital Applications: Issues and Opportunities for the Deployment of Pervasive Networks”, Mobile Networks and Applications, 2007, 155–171 | DOI

[13] Fitbit Inc. Fitbit Official Site for Activity Trackers and More, Fitbit } {\tt https://www.fitbit.com/

[14] K. Frank, M. Rockl, M. J. Nadales, et al., “Comparison of Exact Static and Dynamic Bayesian Context Inference Methods for Activity Recognition”, 2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops) (March 29–April 2, 2010, Mannheim, Germany), 189–195 | DOI

[15] L. Gao, A. K. Bourke, J. Nelson, “Evaluation of Accelerometer Based Multi-sensor Versus Single-sensor Activity Recognition Systems”, Medical Engineering and Physics, 36 (2014), 779–785 | DOI

[16] J. Guo, X. Zhou, Y. Sun, et al., “Smartphone-Based Patients’ Activity Recognition by Using a Self-Learning Scheme for Medical Monitoring”, Journal of Medical Systems, 40 (2016), 10916–016 | DOI

[17] Y. He, Y. Li, “Physical Activity Recognition Utilizing the Built-in Kinematic Sensors of a Smartphone”, International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 4 (2013) | DOI

[18] Z. Y. He, L. W. Jin, “Activity Recognition from Acceleration Data Using AR Model Representation and SVM”, 2008 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (Jul 12–15, 2008, Kunming, China) | DOI

[19] S. Hua, S. J. Kim, N. Kawanishi, et al., “A Context-aware Reminding System for Daily Activities of Dementia Patients”, 27th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW'07) (Jun 22–29, 2007, Toronto, Ont., Canada) | DOI

[20] M. Janidarmian, A. R. Fekr, K. Radecka, et al., “A Comprehensive Analysis on Wearable Acceleration Sensors in Human Activity Recognition”, Sensors, 17 (2017) | DOI

[21] T. P. Kao, C. W. Lin, J. S. Wang, “Development of a Portable Activity Detector for Daily Activity Recognition”, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISlE 2009) (Jul 5–8, 2009 Seoul, South Korea), 115–120 | DOI

[22] A. Khan, N. Hammerla, S. Mellor, et al., “Optimising Sampling Rates for AccelerometerBased Human Activity Recognition”, Pattern Recognition Letters, 2016, 33–40 | DOI

[23] A. M. Khan, Y. K. Lee, S. Y. Lee, et al., “A Triaxial Accelerometer-based Physical-activity Recognition via Augmented-signal Features and a Hierarchical Recognizer”, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 14 (2010), 1166–1172 | DOI

[24] A. M. Khan, M. H. Siddiqi, S. W. Lee, “Exploratory Data Analysis of Acceleration Signals to Select Light-weight and Accurate Features for Real-time Activity Recognition on Smartphones”, Sensors, 13 (2013), 13099–13122 | DOI

[25] O. D. Lara, M. A. Labrador, “A Survey on Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors”, IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 15 (2013), 1192–1209 | DOI

[26] D. Minnen, T. Westeyn, D. Ashbrook, et al., “Recognizing Soldier Activities in the Field”, 4th International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN 2007) (March 26–28, 2007, RWTH Aachen University, Germany), 236–241 | DOI

[27] J. Morales, D. Akopian, “Physical Activity Recognition by Smartphones, a Survey”, Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, 37 (2017), 388–400 | DOI

[28] K. Murao, T. Terada, “A Recognition Method for Combined Activities with Accelerometers”, UbiComp '14 Adjunct Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication (Sept 13–17, 2014, Seattle, Washington), 787–796 | DOI

[29] J. L. Ortiz, Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition, SPRINGER, 2015, 133 pp.

[30] I. P. Putra, J. Brusey, E. Gaura, et al., “An Event-triggered Machine Learning Approach for Accelerometer-based Fall Detection”, Sensors, 18 (2017), 1–18 | DOI

[31] A. Reiss, Personalized Mobile Physical Activity Monitoring for Everyday Life, 2014, 176 pp.

[32] A. Reiss, D. Stricker, “Creating and Benchmarking a New Dataset for Physical Activity Monitoring”, PETRA '12 Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (Jun 6–8, 2012, Heraklion, Crete, Greece) | DOI

[33] P. Siirtola, J. Röning, “Recognizing Human Activities User-independently on Smartphones Based on Accelerometer Data”, International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 1 (2012) | DOI

[34] D. Tam, G. Huynh, “Human Activity Recognition with Wearable Sensors”, TU Darmstadt, 2008, 147 pp.

[35] W. Tao, Z. H. Lai, M. C. Leu, et al., “Worker Activity Recognition in Smart Manufacturing Using IMU and sEMG Signals with Convolutional Neural Networks”, 46th SME North American Manufacturing Research Conference (Jun 18–22, 2018, Texas, USA), 1159–1166 | DOI

[36] N. Twomey, T. Diethe, M. Kull, et al., The SPHERE Challenge Activity Recognition with Multimodal Sensor Data, 2016, 14 pp.

[37] M. Uddin, A. Salem, I. Nam, et al., “Wearable Sensing Framework for Human Activity Monitoring”, WearSys '15 Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on Wearable Systems and Applications (May 18, 2015, Florence, Italy), 21–26 | DOI

[38] K. Walse, R. V. Dharaskar, “A Survey on Human Activity Recognition Using Smartphone”, International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 5 (2017), 118–125

[39] A. Y. Yang, R. Jafari, S. S. Sastry, et al., “Distributed Recognition of Human Actions Using Wearable Motion Sensor Networks”, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 1 (2009), 103–115

[40] H. Yu, S. Cang, Y. Wang, “A Review of Sensor Selection, Sensor Devices and Sensor Deployment for Wearable Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition Systems”, 2016 10th Int. Conf. on Software, Knowledge, Information Management and Applications (SKIMA) (Dec. 15–17, 2016, Chengdu, China), 250–257 | DOI

[41] M. Zhang, A. A. Sawchuk, “Feature Selection-Based Framework for Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Multimodal Sensors”, 6th International ICST Conference on Body Area Networks (12 Jun 2012), 2012 | DOI

[42] VirtualRehab Body–Upper and Lower Extremity Therapy for Various Neuromotor Impairments } {\tt https://evolvrehab.com/