Geodesic
Modeling of influence among the members of the educational team
Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Prikladnaâ matematika, informatika, processy upravleniâ, Tome 15 (2019) no. 2, pp. 259-273 Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Math-Net.Ru

Voir la notice de l'article

We study the problem of determining the rating among members of educational groups of different levels: secondary schools, colleges, universities. Models of ratings of teachers and students are described. The method is based on the DeGroot model using an influence matrix calculated for different types of educational groups are represented by principals and students. In the process of training, the participants of the educational team influence each other by discussing issues, exchanging views, etc. For the principal, feedback from students is important, which is the degree of influence. It is focused on in this work. Another important aspect is the weight of the participants in the team. It is determined by the limit vector for the matrix. Submitted to the consideration of several scenarios, namely: the training team with one or two principals and various subgrops students according to level of training. The influence of the principal in different scenarios also varies. It can affect all participants in the same way or in different ways. It depends on the rating of students. The interpretation of the obtained values of ratings is offered, the results of numerical modeling for various matrices of influence are given. The presented model can be used to determine the professional orientation of any educational group at different levels of education — school, college, university.
Keywords: rating, educational team, reputation model
Mots-clés : influence matrix. 
@article{VSPUI_2019_15_2_a8,
     author = {V. V. Mazalov and Yu. A. Dorofeeva and E. N. Konovalchikova},
     title = {Modeling of influence among the members of the educational team},
     journal = {Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Prikladna\^a matematika, informatika, processy upravleni\^a},
     pages = {259--273},
     year = {2019},
     volume = {15},
     number = {2},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VSPUI_2019_15_2_a8/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - V. V. Mazalov
AU  - Yu. A. Dorofeeva
AU  - E. N. Konovalchikova
TI  - Modeling of influence among the members of the educational team
JO  - Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Prikladnaâ matematika, informatika, processy upravleniâ
PY  - 2019
SP  - 259
EP  - 273
VL  - 15
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VSPUI_2019_15_2_a8/
LA  - ru
ID  - VSPUI_2019_15_2_a8
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A V. V. Mazalov
%A Yu. A. Dorofeeva
%A E. N. Konovalchikova
%T Modeling of influence among the members of the educational team
%J Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Prikladnaâ matematika, informatika, processy upravleniâ
%D 2019
%P 259-273
%V 15
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VSPUI_2019_15_2_a8/
%G ru
%F VSPUI_2019_15_2_a8
V. V. Mazalov; Yu. A. Dorofeeva; E. N. Konovalchikova. Modeling of influence among the members of the educational team. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Prikladnaâ matematika, informatika, processy upravleniâ, Tome 15 (2019) no. 2, pp. 259-273. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VSPUI_2019_15_2_a8/

[1] DeGroot M. H., “Reaching a consensus”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69:345 (1974), 118–12 | DOI

[2] Buechel B., Hellmann T., Klobner S., “Opinion dynamics and wisdom under conformity”, Journal of Economic Dynamics Control, 52 (2015), 240–257 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[3] Gubanov D. A., Novikov D. A., Chhartrshvili A. G., Social networks: models of information influence, management and confrontation, Fizmatlit Publ., M., 2010, 228 pp. (In Russian)

[4] Chebotarev P. Yu., Agaev R. P., “On asymptotics in consensus models”, Management of large systems, 43 (2013), 55–77 (In Russian)

[5] Bure V. M., Ekimov A. V., Svirkin M. V., “Imitation model of formation of a profile of opinions in collective”, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 10. Applied Mathematics. Computer Sciences. Control Processes, 2014, no. 3, 93–98 (In Russian)

[6] Lefevr V. A., Theory of reflexive games, Nauka Publ., M., 2009, 218 pp. (In Russian)

[7] Grabisch M., Rusinowska A., “A model of influence based on aggregation functions”, Mathematical Social Sciences, 66 (2013), 316–330 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[8] Bauso D., Cannon M., “Consensus in opinion dynamics as repeated game”, Automatica, 90 (2018), 204–211 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[9] Golub B., Jackson M. O., “Naive learning in social networks and the wisdom of crowds”, American Economic Journal. Microeconomics, 2:1 (2010), 112–149 | DOI

[10] Hegselmann R., Krause U., “Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation”, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5:3 (2002), 1–33

[11] Parilina E., Sedakov A., “Stable cooperation in graph-restricted games”, Contributions to Game Theory and Management, 7 (2014), 271–281 | MR

[12] Bure V. M., Parilina E. M., Sedakov A. A., “Consensus in a Social Network with two principals”, Automation and Remote Control, 78:8 (2017), 1489–1499 | DOI | MR | Zbl