Problems of differential and topological diagnostics. Part 4. The case of exact trajectorial measurements

M. V. Shamolin

Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Estestvennonaučnaâ seriâ, Tome 26 (2020) no. 1, pp. 52-68

Résumé

Proposed work is the fourth in the cycle, therefore, the diagnostic problem is formulated for the case of exact trajectorial measurements, the diagnostic theorem is stated and proved, and two diagnostic algorithms that follow from this theorem are presented. Techniques for an a priori counting of constants, which should be stored in a program for the computer-aided diagnostics whenever the first diagnostic algorithm is used, and other algorithmic parameters are considered. If the second algorithm is applied, the constants should not be stored; this algorithm is based on the search for the minimum value of the diagnostic functional among the values of this functional that were obtained in the process of diagnostics for the a priori chosen set of reference malfunctions. Various extensions of the diagnostic theorem are considered, namely, the problem of whether the diagnostic algorithms thus obtained are applicable when the dimension of the diagnostic vector being used is lower than that of the state vector or when the uninterrupted express-diagnostics with no checking surface is carried out, the problem of selecting the “minimum” diagnostic time, the diagnostics of malfunctions occurring in the neighborhoods of reference non-degenerate malfunctions and not envisaged in the a priori list. We consider other functionals solving the diagnostic problem. Finally, we state the extended diagnostic problem that is solved by using the proposed algorithms.

Détail

Keywords: diagnostic problem, diagnostic algorithms, extended diagnostic problem.

Bibliographie

[1] M. V. Shamolin, “Problems of differential and topological diagnostics. Part 1. Motion equations and classification of malfunctions”, Vestnik of Samara University. Natural Science Series, 25:1 (2019), 32–43 (In Russ.) | DOI | MR | Zbl

[2] M. V. Shamolin, “Problems of differential and topological diagnostics. Part 2. Problem of differential diagnostics”, Vestnik of Samara University. Natural Science Series, 25:3 (2019), 22–31 (In Russ.) | DOI | MR

[3] M. V. Shamolin, “Problems of differential and topological diagnostics. Part 3. The checking problem”, Vestnik of Samara University. Natural Science Series, 25:4 (2019), 36–47 (In Russ.) | DOI | MR | Zbl

[4] I. T. Borisenok, M. V. Shamolin, “Resolving a problem of differential diagnostics”, Fundamental and Applied Mathematics, 5:3 (1999), 775–790 (In Russ.) | MR | Zbl

[5] M. V. Shamolin, Certain problems of differential and topological diagnostics, 2nd edition, revised and enlarged, Ekzamen, M., 2007, 320 pp. (In Russ.)

[6] M. V. Shamolin, “Foundations of Differential and Topological Diagnostics”, J. Math. Sci., 114 (2003), 976–1024 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[7] P. P. Parkhomenko, E. S. Sagomonian, Foundations of technical diagnostics, Energiia, M., 1981, 464 pp. (In Russ.)

[8] L. A. Mironovskii, “Functional diagnosis of dynamic systems”, Automation and Remote Control, 1980, no. 8, 96–121 (In Russ.)

[9] Yu. M. Okunev, N. A. Parusnikov, Structural and algorithmic aspects of modeling for control problems, Izd-vo MGU, M., 1983 (In Russ.)

[10] M. G. Chikin, “Phase-constrained systems”, Automation and Remote Control, 1987, no. 10, 38–46 (In Russ.) | MR | Zbl

[11] V. P. Zhukov, “Sufficient and necessary conditions for the asymptotic stability of nonlinear dynamical systems”, Automation and Remote Control, 55:3 (1994), 321–330 | MR | Zbl

[12] V. P. Zhukov, “On the sufficient and necessary conditions for robustness of the nonlinear dynamic systems in terms of stability retention”, Automation and Remote Control, 69 (2008), 27–35 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[13] V. P. Zhukov, “Reduction of Stability Study of Nonlinear Dynamic Systems by the Second Lyapunov Method”, Automation and Remote Control, 66 (2005), 1916–1928 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[14] I. T. Borisenok, M. V. Shamolin, “Solving the problem of differential diagnostics by the method of statistical tests”, Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 1. Matematika. Mekhanika, 2001, no. 1, 29–31 (In Russ.) | MR | Zbl

[15] A. Beck, M. Teboulle, “Mirror Descent and Nonlinear Projected Subgradient Methods for Convex Optimization”, Oper. Res. Lett., 31:3 (2003), 167–175 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[16] A. Ben-Tal, T. Margalit, A. Nemirovski, “The Ordered Subsets Mirror Descent Optimization Method with Applications to Tomography”, SIAM Journal on Optimization, 12:1 (2001), 79–108 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[17] W. Su, S. Boyd, E. Candes, “A Differential Equation for Modeling Nesterov-s Accelerated Gradient Method: Theory and Insights”, J. Machine Learning Res., 17:153 (2016), 1–43, arXiv: 1503.01243 | MR

[18] M. V. Shamolin, “Diagnostics of Gyro-Stabilized Platform, Included in the Aircraft Motion Control System”, Electronic Modeling, 33:3 (2011), 121–126 (In Russ.)

[19] M. V. Shamolin, “Diagnostics of Aircraft Motion in Planning Descent Mode”, Electronic Modeling, 32:5 (2010), 31–44 (In Russ.)

[20] W. H. Fleming, “Optimal Control of Partially Observable Diffusions”, SIAM Journal on Control, 6:2 (1968), 194–214 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[21] D. H. Choi, S. H. Kim, D. K. Sung, “Energy-efficient Maneuvering and Communication of a Single UAV-based Relay”, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 50:3 (2014), 2119–2326 | DOI

[22] D. T. Ho, E. I. Grotli, P. B. Sujit, T. A. Johansen, J. B. Sousa, “Optimization of Wireless Sensor Network and UAV Data Acquisition”, Journal of Intelligent Robotic Systems, 78:1 (2015), 159–179 | DOI

[23] C. Ceci, A. Gerardi, P. Tardelli, “Existence of Optimal Controls for Partially Observed Jump Processes”, Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 74:2 (2002), 155–175 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[24] U. Rieder, J. Winter, “Optimal Control of Markovian Jump Processes with Partial Information and Applications to a Parallel Queueing Model”, Mathematical Methods of Operational Research, 70 (2009), 567–596 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[25] M. Chiang, C. W. Tan, P. Hande, T. Lan, “Power control in wireless cellular networks”, Foundation and Trends in Networking, 2:4 (2008), 381–533 | DOI | MR

[26] E. Altman, K. Avrachenkov, I. Menache, G. Miller, B. J. Prabhu, A. Shwartz, “Power control in wireless cellular networks”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 54:10 (2009), 2328–2340 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[27] R. J. Ober, “Balanced Parameterization of Classes of Linear Systems”, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 29:6 (1991), 1251–1287 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[28] R. J. Ober, D. McFarlane, “Balanced Canonical Forms for Minimal Systems: A normalized Coprime Factor Approach”, Linear Algebra and its Applications, 122-124 (1989), 23–64 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[29] A. C. Antoulas, D. C. Sorensen, Y. Zhou, “On the Decay Rate of Hankel Singular Values and Related Issues”, Systems Control Letters, 46 (2002), 323–342 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[30] D. A. Wilson, “The Hankel Operator and its Induced Norms”, International Journal of Control, 42 (1985), 65–70 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[31] B. D. O. Anderson, E. I. Jury, M. Mansour, “Schwarz Matrix Properties for Continuous and Discrete Time Systems”, International Journal of Control, 3 (1976), 1–16 | DOI | MR

[32] R. Peeters, B. Hanzon, M. Olivi, “Canonical Lossless State-Space Systems: Staircase Forms and the Schur Algorithm”, Linear Algebra and its Applications, 425:2-3 (2007), 404–433 | DOI | MR | Zbl