Mots-clés : anapole formfactor.
@article{VSGU_2015_3_a11,
author = {A. F. Krutov and P. A. Nikulin},
title = {Connection of different parametrizations of the proton electromagnetic current operator in discrete symmetries violation case},
journal = {Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Estestvennonau\v{c}na\^a seri\^a},
pages = {140--152},
year = {2015},
number = {3},
language = {ru},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VSGU_2015_3_a11/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - A. F. Krutov AU - P. A. Nikulin TI - Connection of different parametrizations of the proton electromagnetic current operator in discrete symmetries violation case JO - Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Estestvennonaučnaâ seriâ PY - 2015 SP - 140 EP - 152 IS - 3 UR - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VSGU_2015_3_a11/ LA - ru ID - VSGU_2015_3_a11 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A A. F. Krutov %A P. A. Nikulin %T Connection of different parametrizations of the proton electromagnetic current operator in discrete symmetries violation case %J Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Estestvennonaučnaâ seriâ %D 2015 %P 140-152 %N 3 %U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VSGU_2015_3_a11/ %G ru %F VSGU_2015_3_a11
A. F. Krutov; P. A. Nikulin. Connection of different parametrizations of the proton electromagnetic current operator in discrete symmetries violation case. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Estestvennonaučnaâ seriâ, no. 3 (2015), pp. 140-152. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VSGU_2015_3_a11/
[1] M. K. Jones et al., “$G_E/G_M$ Ratio by Polarization Transfer in $\vec ep\rightarrow e\vec p$”, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84 (2000), 1398–1402 | DOI
[2] Rosenbluth M. N., “High Energy Elastic Scattering of Electrons on Protons”, Phys. Rev., 79 (1950), 615–619 | DOI | Zbl
[3] R. C. Walker et al., “Measurements of the proton elastic form factors for $1\leq Q^2 \leq 3 (GeV/c)^2$ at SLAC”, Phys. Rev. D, 49 (1994), 5671–5689 | DOI
[4] Arrington J., “Evidence for two-photon exchange contributions in electron-proton and positron-proton elastic scattering”, Phys. Rev. C, 69 (2004), 032201 | DOI
[5] Krutov A. F., Kudinov M. Yu., “About proton anapole form factor”, Vestnik of Samara State University. Natural Science Series, 2012, no. 3/2(94), 12–23 (in Russian)
[6] Krutov A. F., Kudinov M. Yu., “Electromagnetic structure of the proton within the $CP$-violation hypothesis”, Physics of Atomic Nuclei, 76:11 (2013), 1410–1416 (in Russian) | DOI
[7] D. Wang et al., “Measurement of parity violation in electron-quark scattering”, Nature, 506 (2014), 67–70 | DOI
[8] Mohr P. J., Taylor B. N., Newell D. B., “CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2010”, Rev. Mod. Phys., 84 (2012), 1527–1605 | DOI
[9] R. Pohl et al., “The size of the proton”, Nature, 466 (2010), 213–216 | DOI
[10] Jentschura U. D., “Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen-II. Analysis of the discrepancy of theory and experiment”, Ann. Phys., 326 (2011), 516–533 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[11] Karr J. P., Hilico L., “Why Three-Body Physics Does Not Solve the Proton-Radius Puzzle”, Phys. Rev. Lett., 109 (2012), 103401 | DOI
[12] Hill R. J., Paz G., “Model Independent Analysis of Proton Structure for Hydrogenic Bound States”, Phys. Rev. Lett., 107 (2011), 160402 | DOI
[13] Miller G. A., “Proton polarizability contribution: Muonic hydrogen Lamb shift and elastic scattering”, Phys. Lett. B, 718 (2012), 1078–1082 | DOI
[14] V. Barger et al., “Proton Size Anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett., 106 (2011), 153001 | DOI
[15] Cheshkov A. A., Shirokov Yu. M., “Invariant parametrization of local operators”, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, 44 (1963), 1982–1992 (in Russian)
[16] Balandina E. V., Yudin N. P., “About relations of electromagnetic current parameterizations in quantum theory”, Vestnik of Moscow State University. Physics and Astonomy Series, 36 (1995), 14–19 (in Russian) | Zbl
[17] Zeldovich Ya. B., “Electromagnetic interaction within a parity violation”, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, 33 (1957), 1531–1533 (in Russian)
[18] Dubovik V. M., Tosunian L. A., “Toroid momentums in physics of electromagnetic and weak interactions”, Physics of Elementary Particles and Atomic Nuclei, 14 (1983), 1193–1228 (in Russian)
[19] Krutov A. F., “The analogue of Wigner–Eckart decomposition for Poincare group”, Theoretical physics, 2 (2001), 97–111 (in Russian)
[20] Berestetskiy V. B., Lifshitz E. M., Pitaevskiy L. P., Theoretical physics, v. 4, Quantum electrodynamics, 4th ed., corr., ed. Pitaevskiy L. P., Fizmatlit, M., 2002, 720 pp. (in Russian)