Comparison of two- and three-dimensional models of turbulent flow in the drive cone cavity of a gas turbines engine
Numerical methods and programming, Tome 12 (2011) no. 1, pp. 1-15
Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Math-Net.Ru
The simulation of turbulent flow of viscous compressible fluid in the cone cavity of a high pressure turbine is considered. The Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations and the equations of the Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model are used in computations. The numerical results based on the two-dimensional (axisymmetric model) formulation of the problem and based on the three-dimensional (model in the form of a sector with periodic boundary conditions in the circumferential direction) formulation of the problem are compared. Some small 3D details of the model, such as bolts and flanges, and their influence on the flowfield are taken into account in the computational model. The flow structure (distributions of flow quantities, location and number of recirculation regions, flow direction) obtained in the cavity for various models is compared.
Keywords:
drive cone cavity; gas turbine; turbulence; compressibility; rotation.
@article{VMP_2011_12_1_a0,
author = {K. N. Volkov},
title = {Comparison of two- and three-dimensional models of turbulent flow in the drive cone cavity of a gas turbines engine},
journal = {Numerical methods and programming},
pages = {1--15},
year = {2011},
volume = {12},
number = {1},
language = {ru},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VMP_2011_12_1_a0/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - K. N. Volkov TI - Comparison of two- and three-dimensional models of turbulent flow in the drive cone cavity of a gas turbines engine JO - Numerical methods and programming PY - 2011 SP - 1 EP - 15 VL - 12 IS - 1 UR - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VMP_2011_12_1_a0/ LA - ru ID - VMP_2011_12_1_a0 ER -
K. N. Volkov. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional models of turbulent flow in the drive cone cavity of a gas turbines engine. Numerical methods and programming, Tome 12 (2011) no. 1, pp. 1-15. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VMP_2011_12_1_a0/