Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru
@article{UZERU_2005_2_a3, author = {S. M. Sayadyan}, title = {Comparison of several proof systems of intuitionistic propositional logic}, journal = {Proceedings of the Yerevan State University. Physical and mathematical sciences}, pages = {25--30}, publisher = {mathdoc}, number = {2}, year = {2005}, language = {hy}, url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/UZERU_2005_2_a3/} }
TY - JOUR AU - S. M. Sayadyan TI - Comparison of several proof systems of intuitionistic propositional logic JO - Proceedings of the Yerevan State University. Physical and mathematical sciences PY - 2005 SP - 25 EP - 30 IS - 2 PB - mathdoc UR - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/UZERU_2005_2_a3/ LA - hy ID - UZERU_2005_2_a3 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A S. M. Sayadyan %T Comparison of several proof systems of intuitionistic propositional logic %J Proceedings of the Yerevan State University. Physical and mathematical sciences %D 2005 %P 25-30 %N 2 %I mathdoc %U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/UZERU_2005_2_a3/ %G hy %F UZERU_2005_2_a3
S. M. Sayadyan. Comparison of several proof systems of intuitionistic propositional logic. Proceedings of the Yerevan State University. Physical and mathematical sciences, no. 2 (2005), pp. 25-30. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/UZERU_2005_2_a3/
[1] S. R. Buss, “Polynomial size proofs of the propositional pigeonhole principle”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 52:4 (1987), 916–927 | DOI | MR
[2] S. R. Buss, T. Pitassi, “Resolution and the Weak Pigeonhole Principle”, Annual Conference of the European Association for Computer Science Logic (August 23-29), 1997
[3] S. K. Klini, Vvedenie v metamatematiku, IL, Moskva, 1957
[4] G. E. Mints, “Ischisleniya rezolyutsii dlya neklassicheskikh logik”, Semiotika i informatika, 1985, no. 25, 120–125
[5] G. S. Tseitin, “O slozhnosti vyvoda v ischislenii vyskazyvanii”, Zapiski nauchnykh seminarov LOMI AN SSSR, 1968, no. 8, 234–259