Geodesic
Aspects of defects in integrable quantum field theory
Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 171 (2012) no. 2, pp. 271-282 Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Math-Net.Ru

Voir la notice de l'article

Defects are ubiquitous in nature, for example, in the form of dislocations, shocks, bores, or impurities of various kinds, and their descriptions are an important part of any physical theory. But the following question can be asked. What types of defect are allowed, and what are their properties if maintaining integrability within an integrable field theory in two-dimensional space–time is required? We consider a collection of ideas and questions connected with this problem, including examples of integrable defects and the curiously special roles played by energy–momentum conservation and Bäcklund transformations, solitons scattering on defects, and some interesting effects in the framework of the sine-Gordon model, defects in integrable quantum field theory, and the construction of transmission matrices. In conclusion, we remark on algebraic considerations and future research directions.
Keywords: integrable, field theory, defect
Mots-clés : sine-Gordon, Tzitzéica. 
@article{TMF_2012_171_2_a6,
     author = {E. Corrigan},
     title = {Aspects of defects in integrable quantum field theory},
     journal = {Teoreti\v{c}eska\^a i matemati\v{c}eska\^a fizika},
     pages = {271--282},
     year = {2012},
     volume = {171},
     number = {2},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2012_171_2_a6/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - E. Corrigan
TI  - Aspects of defects in integrable quantum field theory
JO  - Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
PY  - 2012
SP  - 271
EP  - 282
VL  - 171
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2012_171_2_a6/
LA  - ru
ID  - TMF_2012_171_2_a6
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A E. Corrigan
%T Aspects of defects in integrable quantum field theory
%J Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
%D 2012
%P 271-282
%V 171
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2012_171_2_a6/
%G ru
%F TMF_2012_171_2_a6
E. Corrigan. Aspects of defects in integrable quantum field theory. Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 171 (2012) no. 2, pp. 271-282. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2012_171_2_a6/

[1] R. H. Goodman, P. J. Holmes, M. I. Weinstein, Physica D, 161:1–2 (2002), 21–44 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[2] P. Bowcock, E. Corrigan, C. Zambon, Internat. J. Modern Phys. A, 19:suppl.2 (2004), 82–91, arXiv: hep-th/0305022 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[3] P. Bowcock, E. Corrigan, C. Zambon, JHEP, 08 (2005), 023, 35 pp., arXiv: hep-th/0506169 | DOI | MR

[4] E. Corrigan, C. Zambon, J. Phys. A, 37:37 (2004), L471–L477, arXiv: hep-th/0407199 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[5] P. Bowcock, E. Corrigan, C. Zambon, JHEP, 01 (2004), 056, 25 pp., arXiv: hep-th/0401020 | DOI | MR

[6] E. Corrigan, C. Zambon, JHEP, 07 (2007), 001, 38 pp., arXiv: 0705.1066 | DOI | MR

[7] E. Corrigan, C. Zambon, J. Phys. A, 42:47 (2009), 475203, 20 pp., arXiv: 0908.3126 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[8] G. Delfino, G. Mussardo, P. Simonetti, Phys. Lett. B, 328:1–2 (1994), 123–129, arXiv: hep-th/9403049 | DOI | MR

[9] R. Konik, A. LeClair, Nucl. Phys. B, 538:3 (1999), 587–611, arXiv: hep-th/9703085 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[10] A. B. Zamolodchikov, Al. B. Zamolodchikov, Ann. Phys., 120:2 (1979), 253–291 | DOI | MR

[11] E. Corrigan, C. Zambon, J. Phys. A, 43:34 (2010), 345201, 17 pp., arXiv: 1006.0939 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[12] A. G. Izergin, V. E. Korepin, Commun. Math. Phys., 79:3 (1981), 303–316 ; F. A. Smirnov, Internat. J. Modern Phys. A, 6:8 (1991), 1407–1428 | DOI | MR | DOI | MR

[13] E. Corrigan, C. Zambon, Nucl. Phys. B, 848:3 (2011), 545–577, arXiv: 1012.4186 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[14] R. Weston, An algebraic setting for defects in the XXZ and sine-Gordon models, arXiv: 1006.1555

[15] M. Jimbo, “Introduction to the Yang–Baxter equation”, Braid Group, Knot Theory and Statistical Mechanics, v. II, Advanced Series in Mathematical Physics, 17, eds. C. N. Yang, M.-L. Ge, World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 1994, 153–176 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[16] A. J. Macfarlane, J. Phys. A, 22:21 (1989), 4581–4588 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[17] C. J. Efthimiou, Nucl. Phys. B, 398:3 (1993), 697–740 | DOI | MR

[18] H. Boos, F. Göhmann, A. Klümper, K. S. Nirov, A. V. Razumov, J. Phys. A, 43:41 (2010), 415208, 35 pp., arXiv: 1004.5342 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[19] I. Habibullin, A. Kundu, Nucl. Phys. B, 795:3 (2008), 549–568, arXiv: 0709.4611 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[20] Z. Bajnok, Zs. Simon, Nucl. Phys. B, 802:3 (2008), 307–329, arXiv: ; F. Nemes, Internat. J. Modern Phys. A, 25:23 (2010), 4493–4509, arXiv: 0712.42920909.3268 | DOI | MR | Zbl | DOI | MR | Zbl

[21] J. F. Gomes, L. H. Ymai, A. H. Zimerman, J. Phys. A, 39:23 (2006), 7471–7483, arXiv: ; A. R. Aguirre, J. F. Gomes, L. H. Ymai, A. H. Zimerman, JHEP, 02 (2011), 017, 21 pp., arXiv: hep-th/06010141012.1537 | DOI | MR | Zbl | MR

[22] E. Corrigan, C. Zambon, Nonlinearity, 19:6 (2006), 1447–1469, arXiv: ; V. Caudrelier, Internat. J. Geom. Methods Modern Phys., 5:7 (2008), 1085–1108 nlin/0512038 | DOI | MR | Zbl | DOI | MR | Zbl

[23] V. V. Bazhanov, A. N. Hibberd, S. M. Khoroshkin, Nucl. Phys. B, 622:3 (2002), 475–547, arXiv: ; T. Kojima, J. Phys. A, 41:35 (2008), 355206, 16 pp., arXiv: hep-th/01051770803.3505 | DOI | MR | Zbl | DOI | MR | Zbl