Geodesic
Two-component liquid model for the quark–gluon plasma
Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 170 (2012) no. 2, pp. 258-264 Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Math-Net.Ru

Voir la notice de l'article

We discuss a two-component liquid model for the quark–gluon plasma. We show that the model explains the basic experimental observations of the plasma properties naturally on the qualitative level. From the standpoint of the dynamics, the model assumes the existence of an effective scalar field with a nonzero vacuum expectation value. The hypothesis that such a condensate exists is supported by lattice data. We formulate the kind of lattice data that would yield a possible verification of the model.
Keywords: quantum chromodynamics, quark–gluon plasma, holographic model. 
@article{TMF_2012_170_2_a8,
     author = {M. N. Chernodub and H. Verschelde and V. I. Zakharov},
     title = {Two-component liquid model for the~quark{\textendash}gluon plasma},
     journal = {Teoreti\v{c}eska\^a i matemati\v{c}eska\^a fizika},
     pages = {258--264},
     year = {2012},
     volume = {170},
     number = {2},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2012_170_2_a8/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - M. N. Chernodub
AU  - H. Verschelde
AU  - V. I. Zakharov
TI  - Two-component liquid model for the quark–gluon plasma
JO  - Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
PY  - 2012
SP  - 258
EP  - 264
VL  - 170
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2012_170_2_a8/
LA  - ru
ID  - TMF_2012_170_2_a8
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A M. N. Chernodub
%A H. Verschelde
%A V. I. Zakharov
%T Two-component liquid model for the quark–gluon plasma
%J Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
%D 2012
%P 258-264
%V 170
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2012_170_2_a8/
%G ru
%F TMF_2012_170_2_a8
M. N. Chernodub; H. Verschelde; V. I. Zakharov. Two-component liquid model for the quark–gluon plasma. Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 170 (2012) no. 2, pp. 258-264. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2012_170_2_a8/

[1] E. V. Shuryak, Nucl. Phys. A, 750:1 (2005), 64–83, arXiv: ; Th. Schäfer, D. Teaney, Rept. Prog. Phys., 72:12 (2009), 126001, 40 pp., arXiv: ; D. Teaney, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 62:2 (2009), 451–461 hep-ph/04050660904.3107 | DOI | DOI | DOI

[2] S. A. Hartnoll, Class. Quantum Grav., 26:22 (2009), 224002, 61 pp., arXiv: 0903.3246 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[3] M. N. Chernodub, H. Verschelde, V. I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl., 207–208 (2010), 325–328, arXiv: 0905.2520 | DOI

[4] M. Luzum, P. Romatschke, Phys. Rev. C, 78:3 (2008), 034915, 17 pp. ; Erratum, 79:3 (2009), 039903, 4 pp., arXiv: 0804.4015 | DOI | DOI | MR

[5] P. Kovtun, D. T. Son, A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94:11 (2005), 111601, 4 pp., arXiv: hep-th/0405231 | DOI

[6] Ch. H. Lees, Phil. Mag., 6:1 (1901), 128–147 ; L. A. Utracki, Polymer Blends Handbook, Springer, New York, 2003 | DOI | Zbl

[7] S. Koh, The onset of superfluidity in capillary flow of liquid helium $4$, arXiv: 0808.4030

[8] D. T. Son, Internat. J. Modern Phys. A., 16S1C (2001), 1284–1286, arXiv: hep-ph/0011246 | DOI

[9] J. J. Atick, E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B, 310:2 (1988), 291–334 ; B. Sathiapalan, Phys. Rev. D, 35:10 (1987), 3277–3279 ; Я. И. Коган, Письма в ЖЭТФ, 45:12 (1987), 556–559 | DOI | MR | DOI | MR

[10] M. Kruczenski, A. Lawrence, JHEP, 07 (2006), 031, 29 pp., arXiv: hep-th/0508148 | DOI | MR

[11] A. S. Gorsky, V. I. Zakharov, A. R. Zhitnitsky, Phys. Rev. D, 79:10 (2009), 106003, 9 pp., arXiv: 0902.1842 | DOI

[12] M. N. Chernodub, A. Nakamura, V. I. Zakharov, Deconfinement phase transition in mirror of symmetries, arXiv: 0904.0946 | MR

[13] Ch. P. Herzog, A. Yarom, Phys. Rev. D, 80:10 (2009), 106002, 13 pp., arXiv: 0906.4810 | DOI