Geodesic
New perturbation theory representation of the conformal symmetry breaking effects in gauge quantum field theory models
Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 170 (2012) no. 2, pp. 174-187 Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Math-Net.Ru

Voir la notice de l'article

We propose a hypothesis on the detailed structure for the representation of the conformal symmetry breaking term in the basic Crewther relation generalized in the perturbation theory framework in QCD renormalized in the $\overline{\text{MS}}$ scheme. We establish the validity of this representation in the $\overline{\text{MS}}$ approximation. Using the variant of the generalized Crewther relation formulated here allows finding relations between specific contributions to the QCD perturbation series coefficients for the flavor nonsinglet part of the Adler function $D^{\text{ns}}_{\text{A}}$ for the electron–positron annihilation in hadrons and to the perturbation series coefficients for the Bjorken sum rule $S_{\text{Bjp}}$ for the polarized deep-inelastic lepton–nucleon scattering. We find new relations between the $\alpha_{\text{s}}^4$ coefficients of $D^{\text{ns}}_{\text{A}}$. Satisfaction of one of them serves as an additional theoretical verification of the recent computer analytic calculations of the terms of order $\alpha_{\text{s}}^4$ in the expressions for these two quantities.
Keywords: quantum field theory, conformal symmetry breaking, perturbation theory, renormalization group, relation between characteristics of inclusive processes. 
@article{TMF_2012_170_2_a1,
     author = {A. L. Kataev and S. V. Mikhailov},
     title = {New perturbation theory representation of the~conformal symmetry breaking effects in gauge quantum field theory models},
     journal = {Teoreti\v{c}eska\^a i matemati\v{c}eska\^a fizika},
     pages = {174--187},
     year = {2012},
     volume = {170},
     number = {2},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2012_170_2_a1/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - A. L. Kataev
AU  - S. V. Mikhailov
TI  - New perturbation theory representation of the conformal symmetry breaking effects in gauge quantum field theory models
JO  - Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
PY  - 2012
SP  - 174
EP  - 187
VL  - 170
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2012_170_2_a1/
LA  - ru
ID  - TMF_2012_170_2_a1
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A A. L. Kataev
%A S. V. Mikhailov
%T New perturbation theory representation of the conformal symmetry breaking effects in gauge quantum field theory models
%J Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
%D 2012
%P 174-187
%V 170
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2012_170_2_a1/
%G ru
%F TMF_2012_170_2_a1
A. L. Kataev; S. V. Mikhailov. New perturbation theory representation of the conformal symmetry breaking effects in gauge quantum field theory models. Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 170 (2012) no. 2, pp. 174-187. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2012_170_2_a1/

[1] V. A. Matveev, R. M. Muradyan, A. N. Tavkhelidze, EChAYa, 2:1 (1971), 5–32 | MR

[2] O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, Y. Oz, Phys. Rept., 323:3–4 (2000), 183–386, arXiv: hep-th/9905111 | DOI | MR

[3] M. Baker, K. Johnson, Physica A, 96:1–2 (1979), 120–130 | DOI | MR

[4] V. M. Braun, G. P. Korchemsky, D. Mueller, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 51:2 (2003), 311–398, arXiv: hep-ph/0306057 | DOI

[5] R. J. Crewther, Phys. Rev. Lett., 28:21 (1972), 1421–1424 | DOI

[6] S. L. Adler, C. G. Callan, D. J. Gross, R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. D, 6:10 (1972), 2982–2988 | DOI

[7] N. N. Bogolyubov, D. V. Shirkov, Vvedenie v teoriyu kvantovannykh polei, Nauka, M., 1984 | MR

[8] M. S. Chanowitz, J. R. Ellis, Phys. Lett. B, 40:3 (1972), 397–400 | DOI

[9] N. K. Nielsen, Nucl. Phys. B, 120:2 (1977), 212–220 | DOI | MR

[10] S. L. Adler, J. C. Collins, A. Duncan, Phys. Rev. D, 15:6 (1977), 1712–1721 | DOI

[11] J. C. Collins, A. Duncan, S. D. Joglekar, Phys. Rev. D, 16:2 (1977), 438–449 | DOI

[12] P. Minkowski, On the anomalous divergence of the dilatation current in gauge theories, Preprint No 76-0813, Univ. of Bern, Bern, 1976

[13] D. J. Broadhurst, A. L. Kataev, Phys. Lett. B, 315:1–2 (1993), 179–187, arXiv: hep-ph/9308274 | DOI | MR

[14] S. G. Gorishny, A. L. Kataev, S. A. Larin, Phys. Lett. B, 259:1–2 (1991), 144–150 | DOI

[15] L. R. Surguladze, M. A. Samuel, Phys. Rev. Lett., 66:5 (1991), 560–563 | DOI

[16] S. A. Larin, J. A. M. Vermaseren, Phys. Lett. B, 259:3 (1991), 345–352 | DOI

[17] K. G. Chetyrkin, Phys. Lett. B, 391 (1997), 402–412, arXiv: hep-ph/9608480 | DOI

[18] K. G. Chetyrkin, A. L. Kataev, F. V. Tkachov, Phys. Lett. B, 85:2–3 (1979), 277–279 | DOI

[19] M. Dine, J. R. Sapirstein, Phys. Rev. Lett., 43:10 (1979), 668–671 | DOI

[20] W. Celmaster, R. J. Gonsalves, Phys. Rev. Lett., 44:9 (1980), 560–564 | DOI

[21] S. G. Gorishny, S. A. Larin, Phys. Lett. B, 172:1 (1986), 109–112 | DOI

[22] E. B. Zijlstra, W. L. van Neerven, Phys. Lett. B, 297:3–4 (1992), 377–384 | DOI

[23] G. T. Gabadadze, A. L. Kataev, Pisma v ZhETF, 61:6 (1995), 439–443

[24] A. L. Kataev, “The generalized Crewther relation: the peculiar aspects of the analytical perturbative QCD calculations”, Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Continuous Advances in QCD (Minneapolis, MN, 28–31 March, 1996), ed. M. I. Polikarpov, World Scientific, Singapore, 1996, 107–132, Preprint INR-0926-96, arXiv: hep-ph/9607426

[25] S. L. Adler, W. A. Bardeen, Phys. Rev., 182:5 (1969), 1517–1536 | DOI

[26] R. J. Crewther, Phys. Lett. B, 397:1–2 (1997), 137–142, arXiv: hep-ph/9701321 | DOI

[27] D. Muller, Private communication, 1996

[28] S. J. Brodsky, G. T. Gabadadze, A. L. Kataev, H. J. Lu, Phys. Lett. B, 372:1–2 (1996), 133–140, arXiv: hep-ph/9512367 | DOI

[29] J. Rathsman, Phys. Rev. D, 54:5 (1996), 3420–3426, arXiv: hep-ph/9605401 | DOI

[30] G. Grunberg, A. L. Kataev, Phys. Lett. B, 279:3–4 (1992), 352–358 | DOI

[31] S. J. Brodsky, G. P. Lepage, P. B. Mackenzie, Phys. Rev. D, 28:1 (1983), 228–235 | DOI

[32] S. J. Brodsky, H. J. Lu, Phys. Rev. D, 51:7 (1995), 3652–3668, arXiv: hep-ph/9405218 | DOI

[33] P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kuhn, Phys. Rev. Lett., 104:13 (2010), 132004, 4 pp., arXiv: 1001.3606 | DOI

[34] O. V. Tarasov, A. A. Vladimirov, A. Y. Zharkov, Phys. Lett. B, 93:4 (1980), 429–432 | DOI

[35] S. A. Larin, J. A. M. Vermaseren, Phys. Lett. B, 303:3–4 (1993), 334–336, arXiv: hep-ph/9302208 | DOI

[36] P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kühn, “Massless propagators: applications in QCD and QED”, Proceedings of 8th International Symposium on Radiative Corrections (RADCOR 2007): Application of Quantum Field Theory to Phenomenology (Florence, Italy, 1–6 October 2007), 2007, 023, arXiv: 0810.4048

[37] A. L. Kataev, Phys. Lett. B, 668:4 (2008), 350–352, arXiv: 0808.3121 | DOI

[38] A. L. Kataev, Phys. Lett. B, 691:2 (2010), 82–86, arXiv: 1005.2058 | DOI | MR

[39] A. L. Kataev, S. V. Mikhailov, “New extended Crewther-type relation”, Proceeding of 9th International Symposium on Radiative Corrections (RADCOR 2009): Application of Quantum Field Theory to Phenomenology (Ascona, Switzerland, October 25–30, 2009), 2010, 036, arXiv: 1001.0728

[40] P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kühn, Phys. Rev. Lett., 101:1 (2008), 012002, 4 pp., arXiv: 0801.1821 | DOI

[41] T. van Ritbergen, J. A. M. Vermaseren, S. A. Larin, Phys. Lett. B, 400:3–4 (1997), 379–384, arXiv: hep-ph/9701390 | DOI

[42] M. Czakon, Nucl. Phys. B, 710:1–2 (2005), 485–498, arXiv: hep-ph/0411261 | DOI | Zbl

[43] S. V. Mikhailov, JHEP, 06 (2007), 009, 28 pp., arXiv: ; “Any order generalization of BLM procedure in QCD”, Proceedings of the 13th International Seminar Quarks'2004 (Pushkinskie Gory, Russia, May 24–30, 2004), 2, eds. D. G. Levkov, V. A. Matveev, V. A. Rubakov, INR, Moscow, 2005, 536–550 hep-ph/0411397 | DOI

[44] A. L. Kataev, A. A. Pivovarov, Pisma v ZhETF, 38:6 (1983), 309–310

[45] L. J. Clavelli, L. R. Surguladze, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78:9 (1997), 1632–1635, arXiv: hep-ph/9610493 | DOI

[46] D. I. Kazakov, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl., 203–204 (2010), 118–154, arXiv: 1010.5419 | DOI

[47] S. Akula, N. Chen, D. Feldman, M. Liu, Z. Liu, P. Nath, G. Peim, Phys. Lett. B, 699:5 (2011), 377–382, arXiv: 1103.1197 | DOI

[48] M. E. Machacek, M. T. Vaughn, Nucl. Phys. B, 236:1 (1984), 221–232 | DOI

[49] C. N. Lovett-Turner, C. J. Maxwell, Nucl. Phys. B, 452:1–2 (1995), 188–212, arXiv: hep-ph/9505224 | DOI

[50] L. Clavelli, P. W. Coulter, L. R. Surguladze, Phys. Rev. D, 55:7 (1997), 4268–4272, arXiv: hep-ph/9611355 | DOI

[51] T. Banks, A. Zaks, Nucl. Phys. B, 196:2 (1982), 189–204 | DOI | MR