Geodesic
Finite-difference effects in quantum field theory and quantization of classical solutions
Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 82 (1990) no. 1, pp. 55-65 Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Math-Net.Ru

Voir la notice de l'article

The realization of the condition of Poincaré covariance on independent group variables is considered in the general case. It is shown that quantization of these variables leads to an effective theory in which finite-difference effects play the main part and the classical singularities are smoothed by the quantum fluctuations. 
@article{TMF_1990_82_1_a6,
     author = {K. A. Sveshnikov},
     title = {Finite-difference effects in~quantum field theory and quantization of~classical solutions},
     journal = {Teoreti\v{c}eska\^a i matemati\v{c}eska\^a fizika},
     pages = {55--65},
     year = {1990},
     volume = {82},
     number = {1},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1990_82_1_a6/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - K. A. Sveshnikov
TI  - Finite-difference effects in quantum field theory and quantization of classical solutions
JO  - Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
PY  - 1990
SP  - 55
EP  - 65
VL  - 82
IS  - 1
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1990_82_1_a6/
LA  - ru
ID  - TMF_1990_82_1_a6
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A K. A. Sveshnikov
%T Finite-difference effects in quantum field theory and quantization of classical solutions
%J Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
%D 1990
%P 55-65
%V 82
%N 1
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1990_82_1_a6/
%G ru
%F TMF_1990_82_1_a6
K. A. Sveshnikov. Finite-difference effects in quantum field theory and quantization of classical solutions. Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 82 (1990) no. 1, pp. 55-65. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1990_82_1_a6/

[1] Bogolyubov N. N., UMZh, 2:2 (1950), 3–24 ; Khrustalev O. A., Razumov A. V., Taranov A. Yu., Nucl. Phys., B172 (1980), 44–58 | MR | Zbl | DOI | MR

[2] Radzharaman R., Solitony i instantony, Mir, M., 1985

[3] Newton T. D., Wigner E., Rev. Mod. Phys., 21 (1949), 400 ; Jordan T. F., J. Math. Phys., 21:8 (1980), 2028–2032 | DOI | Zbl | DOI | MR

[4] Steinmann O., Nucl. Phys., B131:3 (1977), 459–476 ; Z. Phys., C6:2 (1980), 139–154 | DOI | MR | MR

[5] Matsumoto H., Semenoff G., Umezawa H., Progr. Theor. Phys., 69 (1983), 1631 | DOI

[6] Dorokhov A. E., TMF, 61:1 (1984), 64–84 ; 70:1 (1987), 52–62 | MR

[7] Sveshnikov K. A., TMF, 55:3 (1983), 361–384 | MR

[8] Sveshnikov K. A., TMF, 74:3 (1988), 373–391 | MR

[9] Kadyshevskii V. G., Mir-Kasimov R. M., Skachkov N. V., EChAYa, 2 (1972), 637

[10] Bender C. M., Sharp D. H., Phys. Rev. Lett., 50 (1983), 1535 ; Moncrief V., Phys. Rev., D28:10 (1983), 2485–2490 ; Matsuyama T., Nucl. Phys., B289:2 (1987), 277–293 ; Vazquez L., Phys. Rev., D35:4 (1987), 1409 | DOI | MR | MR | DOI | MR | MR

[11] Friedberg R., Lee T. D., Nucl. Phys., B225 [FS]:1 (1983), 1–52 ; Wolf C., Phys. Lett., A123:5 (1987), 208–210 | DOI | MR | DOI

[12] Landau L. D., Pejerls R., Z. Phys., 69 (1931), 56 | DOI

[13] Ivanenko D. D., Sokolov A. A., Klassicheskaya teoriya polya, GITTL, M., 1949 | MR