Geodesic
The energy determined in general relativity on the basis of the traditional Hamiltonian approach does not have physical meaning
Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 56 (1983) no. 2, pp. 301-314 Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Math-Net.Ru

Voir la notice de l'article

It is shown that the energy of a system defined in general relativity on the basis of the traditional generalization of the Hamiltoaian approach depends on the choice of the three-dimensional coordinate system, as a result of which it can be given any preassigned values. This means that the approach leads to physically meaningless results. 
@article{TMF_1983_56_2_a12,
     author = {V. I. Denisov and V. O. Soloviev},
     title = {The energy determined in general relativity on the basis of the traditional {Hamiltonian} approach does not have physical meaning},
     journal = {Teoreti\v{c}eska\^a i matemati\v{c}eska\^a fizika},
     pages = {301--314},
     year = {1983},
     volume = {56},
     number = {2},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1983_56_2_a12/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - V. I. Denisov
AU  - V. O. Soloviev
TI  - The energy determined in general relativity on the basis of the traditional Hamiltonian approach does not have physical meaning
JO  - Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
PY  - 1983
SP  - 301
EP  - 314
VL  - 56
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1983_56_2_a12/
LA  - ru
ID  - TMF_1983_56_2_a12
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A V. I. Denisov
%A V. O. Soloviev
%T The energy determined in general relativity on the basis of the traditional Hamiltonian approach does not have physical meaning
%J Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
%D 1983
%P 301-314
%V 56
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1983_56_2_a12/
%G ru
%F TMF_1983_56_2_a12
V. I. Denisov; V. O. Soloviev. The energy determined in general relativity on the basis of the traditional Hamiltonian approach does not have physical meaning. Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 56 (1983) no. 2, pp. 301-314. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1983_56_2_a12/

[1] Brill D., Deser S., Faddeev L. D., Phys. Lett., 26A (1968), 583

[2] Choquet-Bruhat L., Marsden J. E., Commun. Math. Phys., 51 (1976), 283–296 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[3] Schoen R., Yau S. T., Commun. Math. Phys., 65 (1979), 45–76 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[4] Witten E., Commun. Math. Phys., 80 (1981), 381 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[5] Faddeev L. D., UFN, 136:3 (1982), 435–457 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[6] Faddeev L. D., Problema energii v teorii tyagoteniya Einshteina, Preprint R-8-81, LOMI AN SSSR, L., 1981, 3–48 | MR | Zbl

[7] Dubrovin B. A., Novikov S. P., Fomenko A. T., Sovremennaya geometriya, Nauka, M., 1979, 353 | MR

[8] Denisov V. I., Logunov A. A., TMF, 51:2 (1982), 163–170 | MR | Zbl

[9] Vlasov A. A., Denisov V. I., Formula Einshteina dlya gravitatsionnogo izlucheniya ne yavlyaetsya sledstviem obschei otnositelnosti, Preprint OTF 81-141, IFVE, Serpukhov, 1981, 3–21

[10] Solovev V. O., Teoremy Neter v kanonicheskom formalizme obschei teorii otnositelnosti, Preprint OTF 82-18, IFVE, Serpukhov, 1982, 3–12

[11] Logunov A. A., Folomeshkin V. N., TMF, 32:2 (1977), 147–166 | MR | Zbl

[12] Logunov A. A., Folomeshkin V. N., TMF, 32:2 (1977), 167–175 | MR | Zbl

[13] Logunov A. A., Folomeshkin V. N., TMF, 32:3 (1977), 291–335 | MR

[14] Logunov A. A., Folomeshkin V. N., TMF, 33:2 (1977), 174–184 | MR | Zbl

[15] Denisov V. I., Logunov A. A., TMF, 43:2 (1980), 187–201 | MR | Zbl

[16] Denisov V. I., Logunov A. A., TMF, 45:3 (1980), 291–301 | MR | Zbl

[17] Denisov V. I., Logunov A. A., TMF, 50:1 (1982), 3–76 | MR | Zbl