Geodesic
The energy determined in general relativity on the basis of the traditional Hamiltonian approach does not have physical meaning
Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 56 (1983) no. 2, pp. 301-314

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

It is shown that the energy of a system defined in general relativity on the basis of the traditional generalization of the Hamiltoaian approach depends on the choice of the three-dimensional coordinate system, as a result of which it can be given any preassigned values. This means that the approach leads to physically meaningless results. 
@article{TMF_1983_56_2_a12,
     author = {V. I. Denisov and V. O. Soloviev},
     title = {The energy determined in general relativity on the basis of the traditional {Hamiltonian} approach does not have physical meaning},
     journal = {Teoreti\v{c}eska\^a i matemati\v{c}eska\^a fizika},
     pages = {301--314},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {56},
     number = {2},
     year = {1983},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1983_56_2_a12/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - V. I. Denisov
AU  - V. O. Soloviev
TI  - The energy determined in general relativity on the basis of the traditional Hamiltonian approach does not have physical meaning
JO  - Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
PY  - 1983
SP  - 301
EP  - 314
VL  - 56
IS  - 2
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1983_56_2_a12/
LA  - ru
ID  - TMF_1983_56_2_a12
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A V. I. Denisov
%A V. O. Soloviev
%T The energy determined in general relativity on the basis of the traditional Hamiltonian approach does not have physical meaning
%J Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
%D 1983
%P 301-314
%V 56
%N 2
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1983_56_2_a12/
%G ru
%F TMF_1983_56_2_a12
V. I. Denisov; V. O. Soloviev. The energy determined in general relativity on the basis of the traditional Hamiltonian approach does not have physical meaning. Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 56 (1983) no. 2, pp. 301-314. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1983_56_2_a12/