On iterative methods of finding the equilibrium in the Arrow-Debreu classical model of pure exchange with multiplicative utility functions of the participants
Trudy Instituta matematiki i mehaniki, Trudy Instituta Matematiki i Mekhaniki UrO RAN, Tome 26 (2020) no. 3, pp. 154-170 Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Math-Net.Ru

Voir la notice du chapitre de livre

For the classical Arrow–Debreu exchange models with multiplicative utility functions of the participants, new iterative schemes for setting the equilibrium prices are proposed. Each iteration of the new algorithms corresponds to one exchange cycle. During each cycle, the participants respond to current market prices and exchange goods based on their budgets and their preference systems. The only observations available to the participants are the disappearance from the market of certain products that pass into the category of scarce ones. This forces the exchange participants to adjust the prices for such goods. Namely, the prices corresponding to the goods that have become scarce grow by some relatively constant value. At the same time, other prices, including the prices of commodities remaining in excess, do not change. Because of this, the total level of prices gradually increases (which corresponds to the normal inflation observed in any market economy). The growth of prices forces a reduction in the excessive demand for scarce goods and its switching to other product groups, in accordance with the existing norms of their interchangeability. Although the growth of prices is fixed, their overall growth from iteration to iteration leads to the fact that not absolute but relative changes gradually fade, providing a generalized convergence of the iterative process. As a convergent sequence, it is possible to track the so-called normalized prices. The corresponding convergence theorems and results of numerical experiments are presented, including cases of other types of economies, up to the most extravagant.
Keywords: economic equilibrium, exchange model, multiplicative utility function, coordinate descent methods.
@article{TIMM_2020_26_3_a13,
     author = {L. D. Popov},
     title = {On iterative methods of finding the equilibrium in the {Arrow-Debreu} classical model of pure exchange with multiplicative utility functions of the participants},
     journal = {Trudy Instituta matematiki i mehaniki},
     pages = {154--170},
     year = {2020},
     volume = {26},
     number = {3},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TIMM_2020_26_3_a13/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - L. D. Popov
TI  - On iterative methods of finding the equilibrium in the Arrow-Debreu classical model of pure exchange with multiplicative utility functions of the participants
JO  - Trudy Instituta matematiki i mehaniki
PY  - 2020
SP  - 154
EP  - 170
VL  - 26
IS  - 3
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TIMM_2020_26_3_a13/
LA  - ru
ID  - TIMM_2020_26_3_a13
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A L. D. Popov
%T On iterative methods of finding the equilibrium in the Arrow-Debreu classical model of pure exchange with multiplicative utility functions of the participants
%J Trudy Instituta matematiki i mehaniki
%D 2020
%P 154-170
%V 26
%N 3
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TIMM_2020_26_3_a13/
%G ru
%F TIMM_2020_26_3_a13
L. D. Popov. On iterative methods of finding the equilibrium in the Arrow-Debreu classical model of pure exchange with multiplicative utility functions of the participants. Trudy Instituta matematiki i mehaniki, Trudy Instituta Matematiki i Mekhaniki UrO RAN, Tome 26 (2020) no. 3, pp. 154-170. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TIMM_2020_26_3_a13/

[1] Walras L., Elements d'economie politique pure, Corbaz, Lausanne, 1874, 407 pp.

[2] Samuelson P. A., “The stability of equilibrium: comparative statics and dynamics”, Econometrica, 9:2 (1941), 97–120 | DOI | Zbl

[3] Arrow K. J., Debreu G., “Existence of equilibrium for a competitive economy”, Econometrica, 25 (1954), 265–290 | DOI | MR

[4] Arrow K. J., Hurwicz L., “On the stability of the competitive equilibrium”, Econometrica, 26:4 (1958), 522–552 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[5] Uzawa H., “Walras' tatonnenment in the theory of exchange”, Review of Economic Studies, 27:3 (1960), 182–194 | DOI

[6] Karlin S., Matematicheskie metody v teorii igr, programmirovanii i ekonomike, Mir, Moskva, 1964, 835 pp.

[7] Arrow K. J., Hahn F. H., General competitive analysis, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1971, 452 pp. | MR

[8] Nikaido Kh., Vypuklye struktury i matematicheskaya ekonomika, Mir, Moskva, 1972, 519 pp.

[9] Shafer W. J., Sonnenschein H. F., “Some theorems on the existence of competitive equilibrium”, J. Econ. Theory, 11:1 (1975), 83–93 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[10] Eaves B. C., “Finite solution of pure trade markets with Cobb - Douglas utilities”, Economic Equilibrium: Model Formulation and Solution, Math. Program. Study, 23, ed. A.S. Manne, Springer, Berlin; Heidelberg, 1985, 226–239 | DOI | MR

[11] Scarf H., “Some examples of global instability of the competitive equilibrium”, Internat. Econom. Rev., 1:3 (1960), 157–172 | DOI | Zbl

[12] Bala V., Majumdar M., “Chaotic tatonnement”, Econ. Theory, 2:4 (1992), 437–445 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[13] Mukherji A., “A simple example of complex dynamics”, Econ. Theory, 14:3 (1999), 741–749 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[14] Tuinstra J., “A discrete and symmetric price adjustment process on the simplex”, J. Econ. Dynamics and Control, 24:5–7 (2000), 881–907 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[15] Antipin A. S., “Ekstraproksimalnyi podkhod k vychisleniyu ravnovesii v modelyakh chistogo obmena”, Zhurn. vychisl. matematiki i mat. fiziki, 46:10 (2006), 1771–1783 | MR

[16] Cole R., Fleischer I., “Fast-converging tatonnement algorithms for one-time and ongoing market problems”, Proc. of the Fortieth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC'08), ACM, N Y, 2008, 315–324 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[17] Kitti M., “Convergence of iterative tatonnement without price normalization”, J. Econ. Dynamics and Control, 34:6 (2010), 1077–1091 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[18] Shikhman V., Nesterov Yu., Ginsburg V., “Power method tatonnements for Cobb - Douglas economies”, J. Math. Econ., 75 (2018), 84–92 | DOI | MR | Zbl