Geodesic
Comparative smootheology
Theory and applications of categories, Tome 25 (2011), pp. 64-117 Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Theory and Applications of Categories website

Voir la notice de l'article

We compare various different definitions of "the category of smooth objects". The definitions compared are due to Chen, Frolicher, Sikorski, Smith, and Souriau. The method of comparison is to construct functors between the categories that enable us to see how the categories relate to each other. Our method of study involves finding a general context into which these categories can be placed. This involves considering categories wherein objects are considered in relation to a certain collection of standard test objects. This therefore applies beyond the question of categories of smooth spaces.

Publié le :
Classification : Primary: 58A40, Secondary: 18F15
Keywords: generalised smooth spaces 
@article{TAC_2011_25_a3,
     author = {Andrew Stacey},
     title = {Comparative smootheology},
     journal = {Theory and applications of categories},
     pages = {64--117},
     year = {2011},
     volume = {25},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TAC_2011_25_a3/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Andrew Stacey
TI  - Comparative smootheology
JO  - Theory and applications of categories
PY  - 2011
SP  - 64
EP  - 117
VL  - 25
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TAC_2011_25_a3/
LA  - en
ID  - TAC_2011_25_a3
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Andrew Stacey
%T Comparative smootheology
%J Theory and applications of categories
%D 2011
%P 64-117
%V 25
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TAC_2011_25_a3/
%G en
%F TAC_2011_25_a3
Andrew Stacey. Comparative smootheology. Theory and applications of categories, Tome 25 (2011), pp. 64-117. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TAC_2011_25_a3/