@article{PMFA_2007_52_1_a2,
author = {Pravda, Vojt\v{e}ch and K\v{r}{\'\i}\v{z}ek, Michal},
title = {Citace: dobr\'y sluha, \v{s}patn\'y p\'an},
journal = {Pokroky matematiky, fyziky a astronomie},
pages = {28--36},
year = {2007},
volume = {52},
number = {1},
language = {cs},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/PMFA_2007_52_1_a2/}
}
Pravda, Vojtěch; Křížek, Michal. Citace: dobrý sluha, špatný pán. Pokroky matematiky, fyziky a astronomie, Tome 52 (2007) no. 1, pp. 28-36. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/PMFA_2007_52_1_a2/
[1] Ewing, J.: Measuring Journals. Notices of the AMS 53 (2006), 1049–1053. | Zbl
[2] Meho, L. I.: The rise and rise of citation analysis. Physics World, January 2007, 32–36.
[3] Lehman, S., Jackson, A. D., Lautrup, B. E.: Measures for measures. Commentary, Nature 444 (2007), 1003–1004.
[4] Leydesdorff, L.: The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-Organization of Scientific Communications. DSWO Press, Leiden University, Leiden 1995.
[5] Scientometrics. Springer.
[6] Jackson, A.: From Preprints to E-prints: The Rise of Electronic Preprint Servers in Mathematics. Notices of the AMS 49 (2002), 23–32.
[7] www.arxiv.org
[8] http://blogs.nature.com/nature/peerreview/trial
[9] Cartlidge, E.: Peer review steps out of the shadows. Physics World, January 2007, 29–30.
[10] Bessiéres, L.: Poincaré conjecture and Ricci flow, An outline of the work of R. Hamilton and G. Perelman. Newsletter of the European Mathematical Society, March 2006, 11–15.
[11] Sher, I. H., Garfield, E.: New Tools for Improving and Evaluating the Effectiveness of Research. Research Program Effectiveness, (M. C. Yovits, D. M. Gilford, R. H. Wilcox, E. Staveley, H. D. Lemer, Eds.), New York: Gordon and Breach 1966, 135 s.
[12] Garfield, E.: Identifying Nobel Class Scientists and the Uncertainties thereof. Přednáška ze dvou konferencí ve Švédsku, 2006. Online: www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/ pub.html
[13] www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/hep/search
[14] www.wos.cz
[15] www.scopus.com
[16] www.citebase.org
[17] http://scholar.google.com
[18] www.ams.org/mathscinet
[19] In-cites, January 2005, www.in-cites.com/analysis/04-fifth-math.html | Zbl
[20] PMFA 47 (2002), 342; 50 (2005), 162–164; 51 (2006), 69–70, 163–164. | Zbl
[21] Not-so-deep impact. Editorial, Nature 435 (2005), 1003–1004.
[22] Hirsch, J.E.: An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. vol. 102 (2005), 16569–16572, [arXiv: physics/0508025].
[23] Bollen, J., Rodriguez, M. A., Sompel, H. Van de: Journal Status. [arXiv:cs.DL/0601030] (2006).
[24] Chen, P., Xie, H., Maslov, S., Redner, S.: Finding Scientific Gems with Google. Journal of Informetrics 1 (2007), 8–15, [arXiv: physics/0604130].
[25] Slater, J. C.: The Theory of Complex Spectra. Phys. Rev. 34 (1929), 1293–1322.
[26] Smolin, L.: Why no “new Einstein”?. Physics Today, June 2005, 56–57.